Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.08089

Bias-Corrected Multiplier Bootstrap Inference for Spectral Edges of Large Covariance Matrices

Abstract

Inference for spectral edges of large covariance matrices is a fundamental problem in high-dimensional statistics. A major difficulty is that the largest non-spiked sample eigenvalues, which serve as natural estimators of the edge, fluctuate on the Tracy--Widom scale. Consequently, valid inference requires accurate centering by the deterministic spectral edge together with a precise scaling constant, both of which are often difficult to estimate in practice under general unknown population covariance structures. In this paper, we propose a bias-corrected multiplier bootstrap procedure for inference on the deterministic edge of the bulk spectrum. The key idea is to introduce a carefully calibrated multiplier perturbation that regularizes the edge fluctuation to a slightly larger scale at which Gaussian approximation becomes tractable. The resulting confidence interval is constructed directly from bootstrap eigenvalues, together with a data-driven recentering step that corrects the bootstrap-induced shift of the deterministic edge. On the theoretical side, we show that, after bias correction and rescaling, the largest few non-spiked bootstrap eigenvalues are asymptotically Gaussian conditionally on the data. Building on this result, we establish the asymptotic validity of the proposed confidence interval, whose length is only slightly larger than the Tracy--Widom scale, and prove vanishing coverage under alternatives in which additional spikes separate from the bulk at a local scale larger than $n^{-1/6}$. As a consequence, the same confidence interval yields a threshold-free estimator for the number of spikes, without requiring the spikes to be distinct or very large. Equivalently, the procedure yields a data-driven and theoretically justified cutoff for the scree plot.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xiucai Ding, Yichen Hu, Jiahui Xie. 2026-07-09. Bias-Corrected Multiplier Bootstrap Inference for Spectral Edges of Large Covariance Matrices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08089

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME