Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.09069

Reducing stable forking dependence to finitely many pregeometries

Abstract

We show that one of the main cases of the stable forking conjecture, stability of the forking relation over a base in a finite-rank supersimple theory, is determined by finitely many pregeometries in each rank. This case of the stable forking conjecture has long had an implicitly well-known pregeometric interpretation: there is a set of matroids $\mathcal{G}_{n}$ such that the forking instability in rank $n$ is equivalent to the pregeometry on some rank-one partial type (over a finite set) embedding a matroid in $\mathcal{G}_{n}$. Our contribution is to show that this set of matroids $\mathcal{G}_{n}$, determining based forking stability in rank $n$, can be chosen to be finite. The main part of our proof was already accomplished in rank $3$ by Peretz, but does not extend as stated to higher ranks (and may or may not directly extend in a weaker sense to higher ranks, by shrinking terms). However, we obtain a sufficient substitute for Peretz's work in ranks $n > 3$: we turn Peretz's original universal result into an existence theorem. The rest of our proof refines an argument from multi-experiment parameter definability, originating from work in applied model theory by Li, Meshkat, Ovchinnikov, Pillay, Pogudin and Scanlon.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Scott Mutchnik. 2026-09-11. Reducing stable forking dependence to finitely many pregeometries. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09069

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bluebirds and mockingbirds cannot produce a fixed-point combinator

Let $B$ be the bluebird combinator with reduction rule $Bxyz \to_{w} x\left(yz\right)$, let $M$ be the mockingbird combinator with reduction rule $Mx \to_{w} xx$, and let $I$ be the identity bird combinator with reduction rule $Ix \to_{w} x$. A fixed-point combinator, called a sage bird by Smullyan, is a closed term $Y$ such that, for a fresh variable $x$, $Yx$ is equivalent to $x\left(Yx\right)$ under these reduction rules. For a fixed variable $x$, we construct an invariant $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(u\right)$ of a $BMI$-term $u$ with respect to $\to_{w}$. This invariant traces the occurrences of $x$ in the leftmost-innermost reduction sequence of $u$. We then prove that $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(Yx\right) \neq \mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(x^{r}\left( Yx \right)\right)$ for every $x$-free $BMI$-term $Y$ and every $r\geq 1$. Consequently, there exists no fixed-point combinator in $BMI$-combinatory logic. This provides a negative answer to the problem posed by Smullyan in 1985.

math.LO

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO

Compactness via Consistency Properties

We will use consistency properties to characterize strongly compact cardinals, first showing an adequate Model Existence Theorem for larger fragments.

math.LO