Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.10913

$τ$-Hochschild (co)homology, the square of the Serre bimodule, and the Coxeter automorphism of the Tamarkin--Tsygan calculus

Abstract

We relate two recent enrichments of the Hochschild theory of a finite-dimensional algebra $\Lm$: the $τ$-Hochschild (co)homology of Cibils, Lanzilotta, Marcos and Solotar, built from Iyama's higher Auslander--Reiten translates of the regular bimodule, and the Coxeter automorphism $σ_\Lm$ of the Tamarkin--Tsygan calculus. We show that the Nakayama functor of the enveloping algebra transforms Happel's minimal resolution into a complex representing $\D\Lm\Ltimes_\Lm \D\Lm$, the square of the Serre bimodule whose shift generates $σ_\Lm$, and that the $τ$-translates $τ_n\Lm$ are precisely the cycle bimodules of this complex. This produces extensions $0\to \B_n\to τ_n\Lm\to \Tor_n^\Lm(\D\Lm,\D\Lm)\to 0$ whose outer term is dual to $\Ext^n_{\Lme}(\Lm,\Lme)$ and whose inner term is a strictly Morita-theoretic residue of the minimal model. In top degree $d=\gldim\Lm$ the residue vanishes and $τ_d\Lm$ is the dual of the degree-one component of the $(d+1)$-preprojective algebra of Iyama--Oppermann; for $\Lm=\kk Q$ hereditary, $τ_{\Lme}\Lm\cong \DΠ(Q)_1$ and $\HH^1_τ(\kk Q)$ is the degree-one part of the zeroth Hochschild homology of the preprojective algebra. For self-injective algebras, the derived part vanishes identically, which explains structurally the growth of $τ$-cohomology for the Buchweitz--Green--Madsen--Solberg algebras. Taking Euler characteristics in the Cibils--Lanzilotta--Marcos--Solotar dimension formulas recovers Happel's trace formula $\sum_i(-1)^i\dim\HH^i(\Lm)=-\trσ_\Lm$. We prove that the two refinements are transversal, propose the combined Morita invariant, exhibit derived-equivalent algebras of finite global dimension whose $τ$-translates have identical dimension but opposite composition, and pose the problem of derived invariance of $τ$-Hochschild theory over the smooth locus.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marco Armenta. 2026-07-12. $τ$-Hochschild (co)homology, the square of the Serre bimodule, and the Coxeter automorphism of the Tamarkin--Tsygan calculus. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10913

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A local relative trace formula for F*\SL(2,F)

In this note, we derive explicitly the local relative trace formula for the symmetric space F*\SL(2,F) at the level of Lie algebras, where F is a p-adic field of residue characteristic greater than two and F* is the set of invertible elements in F. This is perhaps one of the simplest non-trivial analogs of the trace formula, and also a motivating example for the author's work (in preparation) on the relative trace formula.

math.RT

Semi-infinite parabolic IC-sheaf

Let G be a connected reductive group, P its parabolic subgroup. We consider the parabolic semi-infinite category of sheaves on the affine Grassmanian of G and construct the parabolic version of the semi-infinite IC-sheaf of each orbit. We establish some of its properties and relate it to sheaves on the Drinfeld compactification of the moduli stack Bun_P of P-torsors on a curve. We also relate the parabolic semi-infinite IC-sheaf with the dual baby Verma object on the spectral side.

math.RT

The Grothendieck group of an extriangulated category

In this paper, we investigate the split Grothendieck group $K^{\rm sp}_{0}(\mathcal{M})$ of a $d$-rigid subcategory $\mathcal{M}$ in an extriangulated category $\mathscr{C}$. As applications, we prove the following results: (1) If $\mathcal{M}$ is a silting subcategory, then the Grothendieck group $K_{0}(\mathscr{C})$ is isomorphic to $K_{0}^{\rm sp}(\mathcal{M})$; (2) If $\mathcal{M}$ is a $d$-cluster tilting subcategory, then $K_{0}(\mathscr{C})$ is isomorphic to the index Grothendieck group $K_{0}^{\rm in}(\mathcal{M})$; (3) Let $\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d}$ be the $d$-cluster category of type $A_n$. If $d$ is even, then $K_0(\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d})\cong \mathbb{Z}/(n+1)\mathbb{Z}$. If $d$ is odd, then $K_0(\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d})\cong \mathbb{Z}$ if $n$ is odd; $K_0(\mathcal{C}_{A_{n}}^{d})\cong 0$ if $n$ is even.

math.RT