Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.10935

Infinite Belligerent Jump Inversion and Computable Scott Analysis

Abstract

Scott analysis provides two fundamental tools for studying countable structures: Scott sentences, which characterize structures up to isomorphism, and back-and-forth relations, which measure structural similarity. A recurring phenomenon in computable structure theory is that many notions naturally associated with level $α$ of Scott analysis have effective complexity at approximately $2α$ jumps. This discrepancy appears both in the complexity of the back-and-forth relations and in the passage from arbitrary infinitary formulas to computable infinitary formulas. We develop two new coding tools, the Belligerent Pairs Theorem and Belligerent Jump Inversion Theorem, which allow information at complexity level $2α$ to be reflected in computable structures whose distinguishing features already appear at level $α$. These results extend Harrison-Trainor's finite unfriendly jump inversion uniformly throughout the computable ordinals. As applications, we determine the optimal interaction between syntactic complexity and oracle complexity for computable Scott sentences and for formulas distinguishing computable structures. For every computable infinite ordinal $α$, we determine the oracle needed to compute a $Π_α$ Scott sentence for a computable structure which has a $Π_α$ Scott sentence. Any computable structure with a $Π_α$ Scott sentence has a computable $Π_{2α}$ Scott sentence. We show that both of these bounds are sharp. We prove analogous optimal results for formulas witnessing failure of the $α$-back-and-forth relation. We also obtain further applications, including a resolution of a question of Chen, Gonzalez, and Harrison-Trainor concerning the complexity of back-and-forth classes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Uri Andrews, David Gonzalez, Hongyu Zhu. 2026-07-12. Infinite Belligerent Jump Inversion and Computable Scott Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10935

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO

Natural Term Logic

In this paper we develop a formal system called Natural Term Logic (NTL). NTL aims to represent key aspects of the logical and grammatical mechanisms of natural language as well as grammatical transformations which preserve core logical meaning. NTL can be seen as a refinement of the ideas of Quine's paper `Variables Explained Away' and the technical concepts introduced by Bealer and Zalta. NTL is more fine-grained than Bealer's first-order intensional logic (BL): there is a many-to-one correspondence $ν$ between NTL terms and closed BL terms as well as a canonical map $β$ which assigns to each closed BL term a corresponding NTL term. The map $ν$ can be seen as assigning a core logical content of the NTL term. We define a series of reductions on NTL terms which intuitivelyy speaking capture meaning-preserving syntactic transformations ( transformations which preserved the basic logical meaning of a term) and our main result is that each NTL term $T$ reduces to a unique normal term $N$. The reductions fall into the structural, predicative and pushing-in categories. Predicative reductions decompose NTL terms so that predication is only applied to a primitive term (such terms are called prenormal). A key ingredient in the proof is the fact that $βνN = N$ when $N$ is normal. This suggests that within NTL the normal form of a term expresses the core logical content of the term.

math.LO

Hyper-hyperfiniteness and complexity

We show that if there exists a countable Borel equivalence relation which is hyper-hyperfinite but not hyperfinite, then the complexity of hyperfinite countable Borel equivalence relationsis as high as possible, namely, $Σ^1_2$-complete. We also establish an implication between the question of the effectivity of hyperfiniteness and its complexity.

math.LO