Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.11043

Disproofs of two conjectures concerning nondeficient numbers

Abstract

A positive integer $n$ is said to be nondeficient if $σ(n) \geq 2n$. Letting the positive divisors of a positive integer $n$ be written as $1 = d_0 < d_1 < \cdots < d_k < d_{k+1} = n$, and letting $\mathcal{S}$ denote a set of integers, if there exist values $λ_j \in \mathcal{S}$ such that $1 + \sum_{j=1}^{k} λ_j d_j = n$, then $n$ is said to be an $\mathcal{S}$-perfect number. Ross, in 2024, introduced the study of $\mathcal{S}$-perfect numbers, and concluded with two conjectures that each concern both $\{ -1, 1 \}$-perfect numbers and nondeficient numbers. We disprove both of these conjectures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

John M. Campbell. 2026-07-13. Disproofs of two conjectures concerning nondeficient numbers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11043

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT