Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.11157

Where Speech Enhancement Hurts Recognition: An Inference Time Polar Projection Diagnosis

Mingyue Huo·Yuheng Zhang·Hao Zhang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Speech enhancement (SE) can substantially improve perceptual quality, yet enhanced speech does not necessarily improve automatic speech recognition (ASR). Existing remedies, such as retraining the enhancer jointly with recognizer or interpolating enhanced speech with the noisy input, can mitigate this mismatch, but common explanations such as artifacts and over-suppression remain qualitative and do not localize which enhancement component harms recognition. We propose inference time polar projection, a diagnosis for STFT domain enhancement. Given a mask $M=Ae^{jϕ}$, polar projection forms $M_{α,γ}=A^αe^{jγϕ}$, where $α$ controls magnitude strength and $γ$ controls phase correction. Sweeping these controls on frozen SE and ASR models turns ASR degradation into measurable magnitude and phase effects. Our projection analysis shows that magnitude strength is the operative axis, while estimated phase correction provides no recognition benefit. The optimal magnitude strength is recognizer dependent: waveform-input wav2vec2.0 favors strong correction, whereas log-Mel-input, noise-robust Whisper prefers weaker correction. Finally, the projection provides a simple mitigation for any SE front end in the STFT mask domain, without retraining either the enhancer or the recognizer, making it directly useful for voice assistants and agents that rely on enhanced speech.

Explore related subjects

eess.AS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mingyue Huo, Yuheng Zhang, Hao Zhang. 2026-07-13. Where Speech Enhancement Hurts Recognition: An Inference Time Polar Projection Diagnosis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11157

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Revisiting Lexicon Evaluation in Unsupervised Word Discovery

Building a lexicon from discovered word-like units is a central goal in zero-resource speech processing. But do our evaluations provide a trustworthy indication of lexicon quality? A common metric, normalized edit distance, averages the phoneme edit distances between discovered units in each cluster. We show that this metric has an inherent bias toward the quality of large clusters, inhibiting fair evaluation. Moreover, it ignores how well true classes are distributed across clusters. Based on established theory in clustering literature, we propose two metrics that address these shortcomings: a modified metric that weighs cluster size when assessing within-cluster consistency, and an inverse metric that assesses how true words are spread across clusters. Through experiments on synthetic and real-world lexicons, we demonstrate that combined, these metrics are: (1) more closely correlated with how similar a lexicon is to the ground-truth distribution, and (2) more robust to biases that skew lexicon evaluations.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

AURA: Uncertainty-Routed Activation Editing for Acoustic Grounding in Speech Foundation Models

Attention encoder-decoder (AED) Speech Foundation Models achieve strong ASR performance but can generate acoustically unsupported text when inputs contain no speech, weak acoustic evidence, or unreliable transcription. We propose AURA: Activation-editing with Uncertainty-Routed Adaptation, an ultra-efficient representation-editing method that freezes the pretrained model and applies sparse scale-and-shift edits to decoder cross-attention heads. AURA dynamically routes edits using cross-attention uncertainty features that capture over-concentration, diffuse attention, and abrupt frame shifts. We evaluate AURA on four datasets spanning non-speech hallucination and speech grounding stressors, including imperfect-label child speech, imperfect-label adult speech, and disfluent speech. On non-speech audio, AURA reduces hallucination rate from 89.18% to 1.94% without prior hallucination-head identification. On imperfect-label corpora, AURA approaches LoRA WER while using roughly 500x fewer trainable parameters. Sensitivity analysis and qualitative cross-attention examples are consistent with AURA's uncertainty-routed editing behavior, supporting dynamic activation editing as a practical path for grounding AED speech models.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

The design of an optomechanical microphone using a photonic waveguide interferometer

We present an optomechanical microphone based on a diaphragm-integrated photonic waveguide Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Acoustic pressure deforms the MEMS diaphragm, inducing strain in the sensing waveguide and changing its optical path length. We analytically evaluate the optical and mechanical transduction mechanisms and key figures of merit, including signal-to-noise ratio, dynamic range, acoustic overload pressure, and minimum detectable pressure. Two design cases are considered: a MEMS microphone and a measurement microphone. The results indicate competitive performance but no substantial overall advantage over state-of-the-art microphones in conventional applications. The architecture may nevertheless offer advantages for high-temperature and other harsh-environment sensing applications.

eess.AS↗