Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.11381

Common extensions of valuations to rational function fields

Abstract

Let (K(X)|K,w) be a valuation transcendental extension of rational function fields and take a minimal pair of definition (a, gamma). In this paper, we characterize those K-conjugates a' of a such that the monomial valuation induced by the pair (a', gamma) restricts to w on K(X). In particular, we show that a' satisfies this if and only if a' and a are conjugates over the henselization of (K,v). The second part of the paper concerns abstract key polynomials. We introduce the notion of a regular limit key polynomial, and more generally, that of a regular complete sequence of key polynomials. We prove that regularity is equivalent to the property that every root of every key polynomial determines the corresponding truncated valuation. This extends earlier work of Mahboub, Mansour and Spivakovsky by allowing both limit key polynomials and valuation algebraic extensions. As a consequence, we obtain that w always admits a regular complete sequence of key polynomials whenever (K,v) is dense in its henselization.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arpan Dutta, Wael Mahboub. 2026-07-13. Common extensions of valuations to rational function fields. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11381

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Unified Common-Root and Interpolation Bounds Based on Leading Monomial Data

For general fields the footprint bound from Gröbner basis theory estimates the number of common affine roots of any set of multivariate polynomials using information on their leading monomials. In this paper we develop an interpolation bound with a similar flavor extending a previously known result for only a single polynomial to any prescribed number of polynomials. Surprisingly, our interpolation theorem and the footprint bound can be shown to be two sides of the same coin, solving similar problems, but for dual spaces. As discussed the footprint bound compares well with the improved Alon-Füredi bound and for finite fields the presented interpolation theorem is sharp. Our work can be viewed as a comment to a question raised by Tao in [Tao, 2014]

math.AC

Remarks on some Homological Problems regarding Infinite Integral Extensions

Let $R$ be an excellent local domain. $R$ is said to be $NBIM$ if $Tor_{i}^{R}(R^{+}, k) = 0$ for some $i\geq d:=\dim(R)$. Bhatt, Iyengar, and Ma ask if equi-characteristic zero $NBIM$ rings are regular. If $R$ is of positive characteristic, Asgharzadeh and Mahdavi conjecture that $Ext^{i}_{R}(k,R^{\infty}) = 0$ for some $i>d$ implies that $R$ is regular. It is an open question whether $R^{+}$ and $R^{\infty}$ are $\mathfrak{m}$-adically idealwise separated in positive characteristic, a condition from the `local criterion of flatness'. These are analogues of Kunz's theorem and intimately related to the homological conjectures and singularities in algebraic geometry. We apply a result of Avramov, Hochster, Iyengar, and Yao on contracting endomorphisms to make progress on the first two. We observe that it implies toric $NBIM$ rings are regular and solves the conjecture for $F$-pure rings. These improvements are inaccessible by previous techniques and give new and simple proofs of earlier results. In mixed characteristic, we show several linked results for perfectoid-pure rings. We show the third statement when there is $R\rightarrow S$ finite and flat on the punctured spectrum and $S$ is regular, this uses Cohen-Macaulayness of $S^{+}$.

math.AC

Descent along flat composed with radicalization

We study the following general situation. Let $R\to S$ be a finite flat morphism of regular rings of zero (resp. prime) characteristic. For $P\in Spec R$, put $A=R/P, C=S/PS,$ and $B=S/\sqrt{PS}=C_{\mathrm{red}}.$ The basic question is whether a property of $B$ forces the same property of $A$. The main point is that ordinary finite-flat descent applies naturally to $A\to C$, whereas the passage $C\to C_{\mathrm{red}}$ may destroy nilpotent information.

math.AC