Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.12247

The Center of the Temperley-Lieb Algebra

Abstract

We compute the dimension of the center of the Temperley--Lieb algebra $\operatorname{TL_n}(δ)$ over a field of characteristic zero for every nonzero value of the parameter $δ$. The proof uses the cellular filtration by cup number, together with known facts about the representation theory of the Temperley--Lieb algebra, especially the structure of its standard modules and their radicals. Dilation and compression maps compare the induced graded pieces of the center at levels $n$ and $n-2$, giving an upper bound of one for each such piece. A deformation argument gives the matching lower bound, and hence $ \dim Z(\operatorname{TL}_n(δ))=1+\Bigl\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\Bigr\rfloor$. We also prove that every central element is fixed by the canonical anti-automorphism and by the natural diagram-reflection automorphism. Finally, we give a congruence criterion for the trivial-radical case and record a Gram-matrix computation for leading terms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anthony Giaquinto, Mitja Mastnak. 2026-07-14. The Center of the Temperley-Lieb Algebra. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12247

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Categorification of quasi-split iquantum groups

We introduce a new family of graded 2-categories generalizing the 2-quantum groups introduced by Khovanov, Lauda and Rouquier. We use them to categorify quasi-split iquantum groups in all symmetric types.

math.QA

The Ring of Differential Operators on a Nodal Curve is not a Bialgebroid

In a previous article, we showed that local projectivity is a sufficient condition for the existence of a bialgebroid structure on the ring of differential operators on an affine variety. In this note, we show using elementary methods that the ring of differential operators on a nodal curve is neither locally projective nor does it admit a bialgebroid structure.

math.QA

Coset representatives corresponding to Yetter-Drinfeld modules of modular group and continued fraction

We give complete conjugacy classes of modular group SL(2,Z). Particularly, the conjugacy classes of hyperbolic elements are decided by the proper equivalence classes of indefinite forms, and we give an example. Finally, we describe the coset representatives of centralizer of S, ST, T and hyperbolic elements of SL(2,Z) by regular continued fraction. In conclusion, most Nichols algebras over modular group are infinite-dimensional except Proposition 4.10.

math.QA