Revisiting Data Quality Control and Multiple-star Modeling in Wide Binary Gravity Tests: Confirmation of MOND-type Gravitational Anomaly at Low Acceleration

Abstract

Wide binary stars provide natural laboratories for directly probing gravity in the low-acceleration regime, as dark matter inferred from any viable gravity has negligible effects on their internal dynamics. Various recent studies including Bayesian 3D analyses have shown that wide binaries with separations greater than several thousand astronomical units experience MOND-type gravity with a boost factor of $γ\approx 1.3-1.6$. However, results claiming preference for, or no deviation from, standard gravity have also been published during the same period, particularly highlighting the roles of data quality control and realistic modeling of multiple-star (i.e., triple and higher-order) systems that host hidden companion stars. Here we carefully reexamine the issues of data quality control and modeling multiple-star systems in statistical gravity tests based on sky-projected 2D velocities of wide binary stars. Through extensive tests including the acceleration-plane test, the $\tilde v$-distribution test, and the median-$\tilde v$-profile test (where $\tilde v$ is the sky-plane 2D relative velocity normalized by the Newtonian circular velocity between the two stars), we show that proper data quality control or reasonable variation in multiple-star modeling cannot remove the low-acceleration gravitational anomaly but confirms the MOND-type gravitational anomaly, particularly consistent with recent realistic MOND solutions of wide binary orbits. We find that studies claiming no evidence for the low-acceleration gravitational anomaly are consequences of bypassed calibration of the fraction of multiple-star systems using the Newtonian-regime data, bias-introduction in data quality control that is not taken into account in gravity tests, or insufficient statistics in the low-acceleration regime.