Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.17455

Dynamical Systems as Functorial Realisations of Abstract Evolution Shapes

Abstract

We develop a categorical framework for closed dynamical systems in which the abstract pattern of admissible evolutions is separated from its concrete realisation. A closed dynamical system is formulated as a functor $X\colon S\to C$ from a small category $S$, viewed as an abstract evolution shape, to a coefficient category $C$. By varying $S$ and $C$, this single definition encompasses many important examples including autonomous, non-autonomous, switched, hybrid, and stochastic systems. Within this framework, we introduce invariant subsystems, equilibria, and orbits in functorial terms. We then formulate convergence by combining a cosieve-based intrinsic notion of eventuality on the evolution shape with neighbourhood filters of invariant subsystems. Finally, we establish a categorical Lyapunov principle based on categorical sublevel neighbourhoods. This yields abstract stability and convergence criteria that recover the classical Lyapunov method in standard examples.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bangxin Wang. 2026-07-20. Dynamical Systems as Functorial Realisations of Abstract Evolution Shapes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17455

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Mixing Extriangulated Model Structures

Let $(\mathscr{C},\mathbb{E},\mathfrak{s})$ be a weakly idempotent complete extriangulated category. We generalize Cole's Theorem to construct a mixed admissible model structure $\mathcal{M}_m$ from two compatible admissible model structures relative to proper classes $ξ_1\subseteqξ_2$ of $\mathscr{C}$. We then explicitly characterize the cofibrant objects of $\mathcal{M}_m$. Finally, we apply these results to exact and triangulated categories, recovering and extending recent work on mixed model structures.

math.CT

Characterizing (Co)Free Dagger Categories

For any category, there exists both a free dagger category and a cofree dagger category over it. A natural question to ask is: given a dagger category, how can we tell if it is free or cofree without specifying an external base category? In this paper, we provide characterizations of both free dagger categories and cofree dagger categories via internal dagger category structure. To characterize cofree dagger categories, we use rectangular bands and show that a dagger category is cofree if and only if it is enriched over rectangular bands. For free dagger categories, we define the notion of a zigzag dagger category, and then show that a dagger category is free if and only if it is a zigzag dagger category. We also show that free dagger categories can be characterized as the coalgebras of the induced comonad from the free dagger category adjunction, and similarly that cofree free dagger categories can be characterized as the algebras of the induced monad from the cofree dagger category adjunction.

math.CT

A Counterexample to the Open Question on Object Ideals

We give a counterexample to completeness descent from ideal cotorsion pairs to their objects. A radical-square-zero algebra on the two-cycle gives a finite-dimensional example. The construction is intrinsically non-weakly-idempotent-complete.

math.CT