Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.21851

Direct Representations for Interim Correlated Rationalizability

Abstract

We study direct representations of information for interim correlated rationalizability. For a fixed finite payoff structure, each type induces a hierarchy of surviving action sets. Pushing the common prior through this map projects the information structure onto the solution concept's output language. When best-response regions are convex, this representation is direct: the solution concept applied to the hierarchy seen as a type is the identity. The induced distributions are characterized by level-by-level obedience constraints. Terminal ICR sets alone do not have this property. For arbitrary finite payoff structures, we refine each hierarchy level with a tag identifying a convex cell of its best-response region. Augmented hierarchies provide a direct representation and project onto the ordinary hierarchy. Full augmented hierarchies may form a continuum, but retaining only the tags at the boundaries of constant stretches of the ordinary hierarchy yields an exact countable representation with finitely many obedience constraints per type. Finite-type models are dense in terminal rationalizability outcome distributions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Olivier Gossner, Rafael Veiel. 2026-07-31. Direct Representations for Interim Correlated Rationalizability. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21851

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Measurement of Trustworthiness of the Online Reviews

Online review platforms shape consumer decisions, yet reported ratings and comments may be unreliable when reviewers behave inconsistently. This paper models online reviews as a sequential choice problem and proposes a formal rationality pattern function that links a reviewer's current review to their revealed preference history. Building on a two-way consistency axiom for choices from nested sets, we derive an object-specific support trajectory and an associated degree measure in [0,1] (Average Propensity to Choose a Pattern, APCP) that quantifies review trustworthiness. The measure is designed to support information updating and reduce asymmetric information by discounting reviews that are inconsistent with past behavior. A worked example illustrates how the approach assigns trustworthiness grades to reviews for different objects and how these grades can complement aggregate rating statistics. Finally, a generalized theory has been established.

econ.TH

The Depth and Reach of Exploitation: Contracting with Endogenously Naive Consumers

Consumers can invest resources to understand and avoid their behavioral mistakes, and their incentives to do so depend on the market consequences of remaining naive. We incorporate this feedback between consumers' cognitive states and market outcomes into a general contracting model. Firms face a trade-off between the depth and reach of exploitation: deeper exploitation raises profit from a naive consumer but induces greater cognitive investment, promoting sophistication and shrinking the exploitable consumer base. This trade-off disciplines exploitation and can cause policies that benefit consumers when cognition is fixed to backfire when cognition is endogenous.

econ.TH

Contracting under Misspecification

This paper studies agency problems when both parties worry that the model linking action to output is misspecified. With observable actions, an optimal contract is linear in output, so performance pay arises solely to share misspecification exposure, the slope reflects the parties' relative robustness concerns, and its allocation is Pareto efficient. With hidden actions, this sharing rule survives and incentives add a nonlinear correction. Misspecification concerns can polarize effort by making intermediate actions impossible to implement. Moreover, ambiguity across competing models has asymmetric effects: uncertainty about desired actions raises the principal's payoff, whereas uncertainty about deviations can lower it.

econ.TH