Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.22129

A Framework for Individual Tree Growth Reconstruction Using Multi-Platform Laser Scanning

Daniella Tavi·Valtteri Soininen·Lassi Ruoppa·Jesse Muhojoki·Juha Hyyppä
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Accurate tree-level forest monitoring using laser scanning data requires reliable tree delineation, consistent tree correspondence across multitemporal point clouds, and accurate estimation of tree attributes and their change. Reconstructing tree growth in boreal forests is challenging due to the scarcity of historical stem-level data, propagation of errors from older sensors into change estimation, and growth rates with a magnitude of measurement uncertainty. This study investigates a framework for estimating individual tree diameter at breast height (DBH) and stem volume growth using 136 point clouds acquired between 2014--2025 with 11 scanners on airborne (ALS), mobile (MLS), and terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) platforms across boreal forest test sites. Trees were delineated from an MLS point cloud using deep learning-based segmentation which was transferred to the remaining point clouds, resulting in reliable multitemporal tree correspondence. Stem curves were derived from MLS/TLS data, with ALS data used for height estimation, enabling DBH and volume estimation and time series. A height growth-based scaling model was used to reconstruct stem attributes across time and estimate growth. Results showed that modeled growth achieved higher agreement with manual growth estimates than differencing independently estimated attributes from point clouds. The modeled-manual 5- and 10-year growth RMSEs were 55--111\% and 26--67\% for DBH, and 31--87\% and 21--67\% for volume, respectively, depending on plot difficulty. The scaling model was temporally robust, with errors remaining stable or stabilizing after 5--6 years, reaching maximum RMSEs of 8--12\% for DBH and 12--23\% for volume after 12 years. Combining MLS/TLS-derived stem measurements with multitemporal ALS-derived heights provided a robust framework for individual tree growth estimation without requiring multiple under-canopy scans.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniella Tavi, Valtteri Soininen, Lassi Ruoppa, Jesse Muhojoki, Juha Hyyppä. 2026-07-24. A Framework for Individual Tree Growth Reconstruction Using Multi-Platform Laser Scanning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22129

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV↗