Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.23356

How to Draw a Planar Graph: An Experimental Evaluation

Sergey Pupyrev
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Planar graphs are central to graph drawing, with extensive results on planar layouts and related structures. Every planar graph admits a planar straight-line drawing, and algorithms can guarantee additional geometric or combinatorial properties. However, it is unclear which algorithms work best in practice. Even for small graphs with near-perfect manual drawings, standard algorithms might produce poor spacing, distorted faces, or small angles. We present an experimental evaluation of planar graph drawing algorithms on a large benchmark collection of small and medium-sized planar graphs (\(10\)--\(400\) vertices). The study compares established algorithms from the graph drawing literature, practical force-directed and pressure-based heuristics, and new optimization-based methods that directly improve visual properties such as edge-length uniformity, face-area balance, and angular resolution. The results show that no evaluated algorithm is best across all aesthetic criteria, and optimizing one visual property often worsens another. Directly optimizing visual criteria improves targeted scores, and score-guided combination of several methods gives the best aggregate results, but no simple algorithm emerges as a clear universal default. Designing a simple, robust algorithm that performs well across graph families and aesthetic criteria therefore remains an open practical problem.

Explore related subjects

cs.CGcs.DM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sergey Pupyrev. 2026-07-25. How to Draw a Planar Graph: An Experimental Evaluation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23356

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Exact and Approximate Range Queries in Ball Mapper

Ball Mapper summarizes a finite metric dataset by covering the sample with closed balls centered at selected landmarks and connecting landmarks whose balls share observations. Its construction therefore depends critically on repeated fixed radius range queries, yet the effect of replacing exact queries by approximate search has not been systematically characterized. We formulate Ball Mapper through an abstract range query procedure that separates the mathematical construction from the search backend used to realize it. Under fixed ordering, exact procedures preserve the landmark sequence, cover, graph, and membership-based colorings. For approximate procedures, we derive deterministic bounds on covering radius and landmark separation under additive and multiplicative query errors, prove inclusions for the induced nerve, characterize edge survival through witness redundancy for conservative approximations, and bound perturbations of mean vertex colorings. The accompanying implementation provides independent exact reference backends together with exhaustive and approximate search methods under a common closed ball convention. Experiments on Gaussian, mixture, and noisy curve data across three seeds show that approximation fidelity depends strongly on geometry and that edges supported by multiple witnesses are substantially more robust to missed memberships. At 20,000 observations, the approximate indexes did not outperform exhaustive FAISS Flat search. The results therefore establish a framework for controlled approximation rather than a universal speed advantage, and identify the geometric and combinatorial quantities that govern when approximate range search preserves the Ball Mapper summary.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Tight Fréchet bounds for $λ$-low density curves

The Fréchet distance is a well-studied similarity measure between curves. We computing the Fréchet distance between $λ$-low-density curves, the most general of realistic curve assumptions, where every ball of radius $r$ intersects at most $λ$ edges of length at least $r$. Previous algorithms either assumed constant $λ$ or had no tight dependence on $λ$. For two $n$-vertex $λ$-low-density curves in $\mathbb{R}^d$, we give a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for the continuous and discrete Fréchet distance running in $ \tilde{O}\!\left(\frac{λ^{2/d}n^{2-2/d}}{\varepsilon^2}\right) $ time. Our key insight is a tight property of simplifying $λ$-low density curves: the simplification of any $n$-vertex $λ$-low-density curve is $O(λ^{1/d}n^{1-1/d})$-low-density. We show this is tight, and this provides the structural property under simplification that was previously known for $c$-packed curves. We provide matching lower bounds for $n$ and $λ$: assuming the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis, for every $δ>0$, we rule out algorithms with running time $O\!\left( \left( \frac{λ^{2/d}n^{2-2/d}} {\varepsilon^{2-4/d}} \right)^{1-δ} \right). $ We extend our techniques to the map matching problem, where we also give tight bounds.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Witness Set in Weak Visibility Polygons is Polynomial-Time Solvable

In the classical Art Gallery Problem (AGP), guards are placed in a polygon so that together they see every point. The Witness Set Problem (WSP), introduced by Amit, Mitchell, and Packer, is a natural dual to the AGP. In this paper, we study the WSP in weak visibility polygons (WVPs), the simple polygons in which every point is seen from some point of one fixed edge. A witness set is a set of points whose visibility regions are pairwise disjoint, so that no single guard sees two of them. A maximum witness set, therefore, lower-bounds the guard number. Exact polynomial-time algorithms for the WSP are known only for monotone mountains, a proper subclass of WVPs. We give the first exact polynomial-time algorithms for the WSP in WVPs, in two settings. In the Discrete Witness Set Problem (DiscWSP), the witnesses come from a given set of $m$ points, and we find a maximum witness subset in $O(n + m \log(n+m))$ time on an $n$-vertex polygon. The algorithm rests on a structural fact: the visibility intersection graph of a WVP, in which two points are adjacent if their visibility regions intersect, is a trapezoid graph, that is, an intersection graph of trapezoids between two parallel lines. Moreover, the class of these graphs properly contains the interval graphs and the permutation graphs, which may be of independent interest in graph theory. We also prove an $Ω(n \log n)$ lower bound in the algebraic decision-tree model for instances with $m = Θ(n)$, so our algorithm for DiscWSP is optimum. In the Continuous Witness Set Problem (ContWSP), a witness may be any point of the polygon, and we give an exact algorithm running in $O(n \log n + ρ^{2}(n + ρ^{2}))$ time, where $ρ$ is the number of reflex vertices.

cs.CG↗