Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.24186

Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials of matroids need not be unimodal

Abstract

We construct, over every finite field, representable matroids whose Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials are not unimodal. In particular, the conjectures that all Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials of matroids are log-concave and that they are real-rooted are both false. Our examples are obtained by deleting points from finite projective geometries. More generally, we prove that, under a half-rank degree condition in each contraction quotient, the Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomial of every contraction enumerates the subspaces whose projective points lie in the corresponding deleted set, while the $Z$-polynomial agrees with that of the full projective geometry.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ronnie Cheng, Shurui Liu. 2026-07-28. Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials of matroids need not be unimodal. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24186

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Orthogonal Pairs in Maps from the Sphere to the Circle

We prove that, for any $f:S^2\to S^1$ and any $\varepsilon>0$, there exist orthogonal vectors $x,y\in S^2$ such that the length of the shortest arc between $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ is at most $π/2 +\varepsilon$. This proves a conjecture of Ghebleh from 2007 that the circular chromatic number of the real orthogonality graph is equal to four.

math.CO

Exact Area-Range Minima in the Quantitative Monsky Problem for Five and Seven Triangles

For a dissection $D$ of the unit square into $n$ nondegenerate triangles, let $R(D)=\max_i a_i-\min_i a_i, Δ(n)=\inf_D R(D).$ We prove that this infimum is attained for every $n\ge2$, and determine the exact minima for $n=5$ and $n=7$, allowing T-junctions. For five triangles, $Δ(5)=\frac{5\sqrt5-11}{8};$ equality holds precisely when three areas equal $(3-\sqrt5)/4$ and two equal $(3\sqrt5-5)/8$. For seven triangles, $Δ(7)=r_7$, where $r_7$ is the unique root in $(0,1/4900)$ of $864r^4+2160r^3-6060r^2+4972r-1.$ Every minimizer has four areas $(1+3r_7)/7$ and three areas $(1-4r_7)/7$, although its geometry need not be unique. The proofs combine finite combinatorial classification with exact symbolic and integer-interval certificates. For nine triangles, a tilted-strip construction gives the explicit algebraic upper bound $Δ(9)\le 0.0001273496861283553341\ldots,$ which is the exact minimum within that topology. Conversely, every dissection in the complete single-cap two-rail zig-zag family, with arbitrary continuous areas, has range greater than $1/3500$; hence a global minimizer must lie outside that family. The exact value of $Δ(9)$ remains open.

math.CO

Chromatic symmetric functions for annular webs

We introduce a combinatorial definition of chromatic symmetric functions for annular webs. We prove their symmetry by constructing a web analogue of the Shareshian--Wachs involution and show that they coincide with the symmetric functions associated to annular webs via Turaev's isomorphism. We then derive explicit formulas for their hook Schur coefficients. We also introduce web LLT functions, whose hook Schur coefficients admit positive Laurent-polynomial formulas. These formulas yield a combinatorial expression for the coefficients of the HOMFLY--PT polynomial of an annular web.

math.CO