Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2607.28813

The Multiset Dimension of Graphs: Extremal Values and King Grids

Abstract

We present three results on the multiset dimension of graphs, resolving one conjecture and two open questions from the literature. First, we disprove the conjecture of Simanjuntak, Siagian and Vetrík (2017) that every graph $G$ of order $n(G)$ with finite multiset dimension satisfies $\dim_m(G) \le n(G)-1$: an exhaustive computation over all 1,018,690,328 connected graphs of orders 2 through 11 shows that exactly eight graphs attain $\dim_m(G)=n(G)$, all of order 11, so 11 is the smallest order at which the trivial upper bound is attained. This also answers a question from the recent survey of Farhan, Klavžar, Kuziak and Yero. Second, we prove that $\dim_m(P_n \boxtimes P_n)=4$ for every $n \ge 5$, answering a question of Hakanen and Yero: after a $45^\circ$ change of coordinates the Chebyshev metric of the king grid becomes half the Manhattan metric on a parity sublattice, and four boundary inequalities reduce every potentially resolving three-landmark set to two geometric cases, in each of which we exhibit an explicit collision. Third, on king strips the parameter grows linearly: $\dim_m(P_3 \boxtimes P_n)=n$ for $n \ge 6$ (with the small cases determined exactly), where the lower bound rests on three local separation conditions and a finite min-plus transfer certificate whose equality case yields a finite automaton with a 19-state recurrent core, and the upper bound is an explicit landmark pattern of period three that works for every height. Combined with a blindness lower bound, $\dim_m(P_h \boxtimes P_n) = Θ(n)$ for every fixed $h \ge 3$, so the constant answer on square king grids requires both dimensions to grow.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jaan Allikvere. 2026-07-30. The Multiset Dimension of Graphs: Extremal Values and King Grids. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28813

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO