Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.29576

The gate of self-address: where decidable adjudication ends

Platon Sifnaios
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

An annulment structure consists of a numbered domain of distinctions with a $Σ^0_1$ manifestation predicate; an adjudicator is a partial map assigning to distinctions the verdicts annulled or exempt. We ask which domains admit an adjudicator that is total, correct, and complete in its mission -- annulling every non-manifesting member -- and locate the boundary exactly. On the positive side, domains with decidable manifestation admit canonical adjudicators with certificates, instantiated for Presburger arithmetic and finite-state re-entry systems. On the negative side, adjoining a single nullary gate, by which a distinction may query the verdict passed on itself, destroys decidability uniformly: the extended domain carries a trichotomy in which every adjudicator fails totality, exhaustiveness, or soundness at one distinction fixed in advance. Bounding the depth of self-address refines this: each finite level remains decidable, the hierarchy of iterated verdicts is the synchronous update of a Boolean network on the query graph, deciding stabilisation is PSpace-complete for explicitly presented networks, and periods as large as $2^n-1$ occur at closure size $n$. In the limit what fails is convergence, not decidability; the diagonal distinctions oscillate with period two, and their mean frequency of $1/2$ is the value a reflective oracle is forced to return there. Over the standard domain relative to an oracle $X$, the least Turing degree of an adjudicator with all three properties is the degree of $X'$: adjudication costs one jump per level. The boundary is a three-way trade among determinacy, correctness, and residence at the level adjudicated. The fixed-point core holds over every precomplete numbering in the sense of Ershov. The framework falls on the intensional side of the divide between Kleene's two recursion theorems. Gödel's incompleteness theorems are nowhere used.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Platon Sifnaios. 2026-07-31. The gate of self-address: where decidable adjudication ends. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29576

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bluebirds and mockingbirds cannot produce a fixed-point combinator

Let $B$ be the bluebird combinator with reduction rule $Bxyz \to_{w} x\left(yz\right)$, let $M$ be the mockingbird combinator with reduction rule $Mx \to_{w} xx$, and let $I$ be the identity bird combinator with reduction rule $Ix \to_{w} x$. A fixed-point combinator, called a sage bird by Smullyan, is a closed term $Y$ such that, for a fresh variable $x$, $Yx$ is equivalent to $x\left(Yx\right)$ under these reduction rules. For a fixed variable $x$, we construct an invariant $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(u\right)$ of a $BMI$-term $u$ with respect to $\to_{w}$. This invariant traces the occurrences of $x$ in the leftmost-innermost reduction sequence of $u$. We then prove that $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(Yx\right) \neq \mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(x^{r}\left( Yx \right)\right)$ for every $x$-free $BMI$-term $Y$ and every $r\geq 1$. Consequently, there exists no fixed-point combinator in $BMI$-combinatory logic. This provides a negative answer to the problem posed by Smullyan in 1985.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Compactness via Consistency Properties

We will use consistency properties to characterize strongly compact cardinals, first showing an adequate Model Existence Theorem for larger fragments.

math.LO↗