Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.01364

U-centering as subset ANOVA: edge regression and higher-order theory

Abstract

The unbiased sample versions of squared distance covariance and the Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC) are fourth-order U-statistics, yet U-centering evaluates them from pairwise arrays in $O(n^2)$ operations. We show that U-centering is exactly the least-squares residual obtained after fitting additive endpoint effects to a symmetric hollow array. This interpretation explains the zero row sums and the denominator $n(n-3)$ through the residual degrees of freedom. The same pairwise residualization also gives useful regression identities. After endpoint effects are removed from both arrays, the U-centered dependence $t$-statistic is the ordinary slope $t$-statistic obtained by regressing one adjusted array on the other. In the two-sample problem, pooling the observations and using the between-group pair indicator as the predictor shows that the generalized-energy statistic is twice the fitted slope. The common-endpoint and fully interacted regressions give the same slope but use different residual standard errors. For $n\ge2r$, we extend the construction to arrays indexed by $r$-subsets. Higher-order U-centering removes all effects involving fewer than $r$ sample labels, leaves zero $(r-1)$-way margins, and projects onto a residual space of dimension $\binom nr-\binom n{r-1}$. For two symmetric kernels with $r$ arguments, the normalized inner product of the centered arrays is unbiased for the cross-moment of their $r$th Hoeffding components. A direct estimator can involve products spanning as many as $2r$ observations, but subset-margin inversion or higher-order U-centering evaluates the same quantity in $O(n^r)$ operations for fixed $r$. When both arrays are formed from the same kernel and sample, this becomes a nonnegative unbiased estimator of the variance of the highest-order Hoeffding component.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xianyang Zhang. 2026-08-09. U-centering as subset ANOVA: edge regression and higher-order theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01364

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Functional independent component analysis by choice of norm: a framework for near-perfect classification

We develop a theory for functional independent component analysis in an infinite-dimensional framework using Sobolev spaces that accommodate smoother functions. The notion of penalized kurtosis is introduced motivated by Silverman's method for smoothing principal components. This approach allows for a classical definition of independent components obtained via projection onto the eigenfunctions of a smoothed kurtosis operator mapping a whitened functional random variable. We discuss the theoretical properties of this operator in relation to a generalized Fisher discriminant function and the relationship it entails with the Feldman-Hájek dichotomy for Gaussian measures, both of which are critical to the principles of functional classification. The proposed estimators are a particularly competitive alternative in binary classification of functional data and can eventually achieve the so-called near-perfect classification, which is a genuine phenomenon of high-dimensional data. Our methods are illustrated through simulations, various real datasets, and used to model electroencephalographic biomarkers for the diagnosis of depressive disorder.

math.ST

Trace-Class Results for MCMC Algorithms for Student-$t$ Regression Models

In this paper, we consider MCMC algorithms for Student-$t$ regression models. In three cases, we investigate the efficiency of Markov chains based on the algorithms in terms of whether trace-class results hold or not. First, we consider the case where the parameters follow a matrix-normal-inverse-Wishart distribution and show that the Markov operator associated with a standard data augmentation algorithm is trace-class. Second, we consider the case of an improper prior and univariate outcomes. In this case, the standard Markov operator is not trace-class but the Markov operator associated with a collapsed Gibbs algorithm is trace-class. Third, we consider the case of an improper prior and multivariate outcomes. We obtain a trace-class result for a parameter expanded data augmentation algorithm which is based on a univariate working parameter. Finally, we consider the problem of numerially estimating a convergence rate of the trace-class Markov operator in the second case.

math.ST

The Manifold Hypothesis under Unknown Gaussian Noise:Conditional Certificates and Consistent Dimension Estimation

We study what noisy data can establish about the Manifold Hypothesis under explicit identification and regularity conditions. A population residual certificate combines independent-view localization, Gaussian concentration, membership uncertainty, and population transfer. Existing rectifiability criteria then yield a covered-scale consequence. For a local smooth manifold with positive Hölder density, the actual-ball covariance limit identifies the spectral crossing with geometric dimension. We prove almost-sure eventual recovery under repeated observations. Reusing accurate localization averages improves the sufficient point-sample condition from $Nr^{d+4}\gg\log N$ to $Nr^d\gg\log N$, with replication $kr^2\gg\log N$. A two-mass certificate controls incorrect geometric-dimension emissions under declared class bounds. For single observations with unknown Gaussian noise, affine-support or known coordinate-bound restrictions provide noise intervals and consistent Gaussian correlation-dimension estimators. Ahlfors regularity identifies this exponent with Hausdorff dimension and with the geometric dimension of a homogeneous smooth class. Exact Cantor calculations delineate the limits of integer spectral counts and adjacent-radius slopes. We credit established local PCA, rectifiability, concentration, binomial inference, and deconvolution results before specifying our constructions. Reproducible experiments distinguish point estimation, finite-scale coverage, and certificate emission.

math.ST