Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.01606

An improved upper bound for the Zarankiewicz number z(43;2) <= 294 via structural rigidity, including hexary packing number pa(5;6) = 31

Abstract

The Zarankiewicz number z(n;2) is the largest number of ones in an n x n zero-one matrix with no all-one 2x2 submatrix. At n=43, the Kovari-Sos-Turan bound, sharpened by Reiman, gives z(43;2) <= 301 with no rounding slack; equality would force a projective plane of order six, which Tarry ruled out in 1900. That fact alone says nothing about how far below 301 the truth lies. We prove z(43;2) <= 294. The argument is local and geometric. Writing D = 301 - E for the deficiency of a configuration with E ones, a crossing count paired with its dual forces every line to at most eight points and every point to at most eight lines whenever D <= 6. A deficiency count then produces a clean point of degree seven, collinear with all others, unless the configuration has both a line of eight points and a point of degree eight. The seven lines through a clean point partition the remaining 42 points into groups that every other line meets at most once, so the number of (line, missed group) incidences equals D. At D=6 this forces group sizes 6,6,6,6,6,6,6 or 7,6,6,6,6,6,5; the second forces a TD(4,6), and the first yields 32 blocks of a partial TD(5,6), whose refutation needs an unknown packing number. We determine it. pa(5;6) and pa(6;6) are listed as open in the Handbook of Combinatorial Designs at 30 <= N <= 34; a class holds at most six words, so at most one full class gives at most 6 + 5*5 = 31, and what was missing was refuting the two-full-class case, done here by exhaustive search. Hence pa(5;6) = pa(6;6) = 31. With no clean point, the configuration is rigid enough to complete to a projective plane of order six. With a known 290-one configuration, this gives 290 <= z(43;2) <= 294. We also derive z(43;2) <= 299 via Totten's classification, and rule out configurations with 290+ ones from deleting rows/columns of PG(2,7).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ankan Sadhu. 2026-08-08. An improved upper bound for the Zarankiewicz number z(43;2) <= 294 via structural rigidity, including hexary packing number pa(5;6) = 31. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01606

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO