Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.03351

Sensitivity and Size Relationships of the Lempel-Ziv Factorization

Abstract

The Lempel-Ziv (LZ) factorization is one of the most fundamental methods for compressing highly repetitive strings, and the number of phrases in its factorization is considered a repetitiveness measure. Sensitivity to an edit operation measures the maximum increase in a repetitiveness measure when the operation is applied to a string. While asymptotically tight bounds are known for the sensitivity of the LZ factorization to single-character edits, whether its multiplicative sensitivity is bounded by a constant has remained open for operations that change a large part of the structure of a string, such as prefix deletion, substring deletion, cyclic rotation, and string reversal. We resolve this question. For each of these four operations, we construct a family of strings in which a string of length $n$ has sensitivity $Ω(\log n)$ to that operation. We also determine the size relationships among the LZ factorization, collage systems and the lex-parse. We construct a family of strings whose LZ factorizations are $Ω(\log n)$ times larger than their minimum collage systems, and a family of strings whose lex-parses are $Ω(\log n)$ times larger than their LZ factorizations. Furthermore, we prove that there exists a family of strings for which every LZ encoding of height $O({\rm poly}\,\log n)$ is $Ω(\log n / \log \log n)$ times larger than the standard LZ factorization. Except for the lower bound on height-bounded LZ encodings, all of these lower bounds are asymptotically tight, matching $O(\log n)$ upper bounds.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hiroki Shibata, Yuto Fujie. 2026-08-30. Sensitivity and Size Relationships of the Lempel-Ziv Factorization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03351

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

DS-Lighting: Making Agent Harnesses Explicit for Data-Science Automation

Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promise for automating data-science workflows, yet their end-to-end performance depends critically on the agent harness that represents tasks, manages execution state, constrains output artifacts, and provides evaluation feedback. Existing data-science agents often leave this harness implicit, making results difficult to reproduce, compare, and attribute across heterogeneous tasks. We introduce DS-Lighting, a unified harness toolkit that makes harness design explicit for data-science automation. DS-Lighting decomposes the harness into four reusable layers: data, workflow, execution, and evaluation, and represents diverse agents as executable operator programs that support both predefined pipelines and adaptive search. We further integrate multiple open-source data-science benchmarks into an MLE-Bench-style task format, enabling controlled comparison under a shared task interface, sandboxed runtime, and metric protocol. Experiments across agents, harnesses, models, and ablations show that explicit harness design improves reproducibility, comparability, and reliability, while reducing avoidable system-level failures in end-to-end data-science workflows. Our code is available at https://github.com/usail-hkust/dslighting

cs.AI

Disproving the Greedy Superstring Conjecture

The shortest common superstring problem is to find the shortest string that contains every string in a given set as a substring. It is conjectured that the greedy algorithm that repeatedly selects a pair of strings with maximum overlap and merges them is a $2$-approximation algorithm, and this conjecture had remained open for nearly four decades. In this paper, we disprove this conjecture and show that the approximation ratio of this algorithm is at least $9/4$.

cs.DS

The Bron-Kerbosch Algorithm with Vertex Ordering is Output-Sensitive

The Bron-Kerbosch algorithm is a well known maximal clique enumeration algorithm. So far it was unknown whether it was output sensitive or not. In this paper we partially answer this question by proving that the Bron-Kerbosch Algorithm with vertex ordering, first introduced and studied by Eppstein, Löffler and Strash in "Listing all maximal cliques in sparse graphs in near-optimal time. International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010" is output sensitive.

cs.DS