Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.03694

Statistical Verification of Quantitative Hyperproperties: Beyond Boolean Quantification

Abstract

Formalisms for hyperproperties provide a solid foundation for studying the verification problem across classes of relational properties, such as those in information flow control (IFC). However, existing formalisms remain limited in expressiveness when it comes to capturing practical aspects of real-world systems. In particular, they do not adequately account for the quantitative nature of such systems. In this paper, we address this gap by revisiting the specification and verification of hyperproperties from a quantitative, measure-based, perspective. We introduce Quantitative Hyper-Logic (QHL), which replaces qualitative trace quantifiers with measure-based ones and extends temporal predicates with richer quantitative expressions. We further study the verification problem from a statistical verification point of view, and develop algorithms for the statistical verification of QHL specifications. For the introduced measure-based quantifiers, we particularly provide an analysis in terms of sample complexity and achievable statistical guarantees. In particular, we show how statistical methods such as Hoeffding's inequality and extreme value theory can be combined to develop statistical verification algorithms for nested measure-based quantifiers. Our approach provides quantitative alternatives for where traditional verification methods become infeasible. We demonstrate both expressiveness and efficacy on benchmarks from quantitative IFC, comparing against qualitative methods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Amir M. Ahmadian, Hazem Torfah. 2026-08-04. Statistical Verification of Quantitative Hyperproperties: Beyond Boolean Quantification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03694

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deciding Predicate Logical Theories of Real-Valued Functions

The notion of a real-valued function is central to mathematics, computer science, and many other scientific fields. Despite this importance, there are hardly any positive results on decision procedures for predicate logical theories that reason about real-valued functions. This paper defines a first-order predicate language for reasoning about multi-dimensional smooth real-valued functions and their derivatives, and demonstrates that - despite the obvious undecidability barriers - certain positive decidability results for such a language are indeed possible.

cs.LO

Structural Liveness of Conservative Petri Nets

We show that the EXPSPACE-hardness result for structural liveness of Petri nets [Jancar and Purser, 2019] holds even for a simple subclass of conservative nets. As our main result, we prove that for structurally live conservative nets, the values of the minimal live markings are at most doubly exponential in the size of the net. This implies the EXPSPACE-completeness of structural liveness for conservative Petri nets. The result also applies to structurally bounded Petri nets, whereas the complexity of the general case remains open. As a proof ingredient of independent interest, we present an extension of known results on the bounds of minimal integer solutions to Boolean combinations of linear equalities, inequalities, and divisibility constraints.

cs.LO

Verifying Numerical Methods with Isabelle/HOL

Modern machine learning pipelines and ODE solvers are built on numerical algorithms. Reliable numerical methods are thus a prerequisite for trustworthy machine learning and cyber-physical systems. We evaluate a framework designed for verifying imperative programs and the Isabelle proof assistant as tools for proving the total correctness of four numerical algorithms: the bisection method, the fixed-point method, the perceptron, and the gradient descent algorithm. Our verifications required subtle extensions and generalisations to Isabelle's version of Taylor's theorem and higher-order derivatives. Finally, we reflect on the framework's automation, friendly syntax, and on further requirements to turn it into a verification tool for numerical methods.

cs.LO