Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.05335

Fuzzy latin squares and balanced permutation pattern statistics

Abstract

A latin square of order $n$ can be viewed as a partition of the $n \times n$ all-ones matrix into permutation matrix summands. Here, we consider a relaxation in which the matrix summands are allowed to be induced from shorter permutations. For $σ\in S_k$, the `fuzzy permutation matrix' $P_σ^{\uparrow n}$ arises from combining all $\binom{n}{k}^2$ order-preserving embeddings of the $k \times k$ permutation matrix $P_σ$ into an $n \times n$ matrix. We define a fuzzy latin square as a linear combination of $n \times n$ fuzzy permutation matrices $P_σ^{\uparrow n}$ equaling a constant matrix. We study various aspects of these objects, including certain relevant vector space dimensions and a census of fuzzy latin squares with a small number of terms. In particular, we determine strong conditions on four-term fuzzy latin squares in the `vanishing' case (when the constant matrix is all zeros). We also report on a computer-assisted classification of six-term fuzzy latin squares in the non-vanishing case.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Joy Cooper, Peter J. Dukes. 2026-08-05. Fuzzy latin squares and balanced permutation pattern statistics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05335

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO