Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.06482

Rendezvous of Mobile Deterministic Automata in Graphs

Bibhuti Das·Andrzej Pelc
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Two mobile agents, modeled as identical deterministic finite automata (DFA) navigating in synchronous rounds in a graph with unlabeled nodes, have to meet at some node. The well-researched task of meeting in a graph is known as rendezvous. Agents start at adversarially chosen distinct nodes in possibly different rounds. An instance of the rendezvous problem is the underlying graph, together with the initial nodes $u$ and $v$ of the agents. Such an instance is feasible, if there exists a DFA (possibly working only for this instance), such that its identical copies starting at nodes $u$ and $v$, with an arbitrary delay, accomplish rendezvous. A DFA is RV-universal for a class of instances, if it guarantees rendezvous of its copies starting at the designated nodes with arbitrary delay, for all feasible instances of this class. Our goal is to investigate the existence of RV-universal DFA. We start by observing that if agents cannot mark nodes in any way then there does not exist a RV-universal DFA even for the class of instances where the underlying graph is a line. Hence we allow the use of identical pebbles to mark the nodes by the agents. We consider stationary pebbles that can be dropped by agents at nodes but cannot be picked up, and movable pebbles that can be dropped by agents and later picked up. We observe that, even in the more powerful scenario of movable pebbles, if agents are equipped with any finite number of pebbles, there is no RV-universal DFA for the class of all instances. Hence we restrict attention to instances where the underlying graph is a tree. Our main contribution are two contrasting results showing that movability of pebbles is a crucial feature. We first prove that for any finite number of stationary pebbles there is no RV-universal DFA for trees, and then we design a RV-universal DFA for trees, where each agent is equipped with a single movable pebble.

Explore related subjects

cs.DC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bibhuti Das, Andrzej Pelc. 2026-08-06. Rendezvous of Mobile Deterministic Automata in Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06482

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Multimmit: Extending Blocks for Faster Finality

To meet the throughput demands of modern blockchain systems, protocols for State Machine Replication (SMR) increasingly have many processors disseminate blocks of transactions in parallel, with consensus then establishing a total ordering on the blocks of all producers. Such designs face a choice as to when a block may enter the ordering. Certified approaches wait for a quorum to attest a block's availability, which is robust but adds message delays to every transaction. Uncertified approaches let proposals reference blocks immediately, which is fast but degrades rapidly when referenced data must be fetched on the critical path. Raptr, the state of the art, takes a middle course, finalising the longest prefix of the leader's proposal that a quorum holds, so that no processor ever blocks or fetches. The remaining weakness is sensitivity to order: if the data behind a single early batch is withheld, the proposal finalises little or nothing, so individual faulty producers can still deny the system its optimistic path. We present Multimmit, a protocol for $n \ge 5f+1$ processors combining a consensus layer requiring one round of voting per view with multi-chain data dissemination. Votes are cast relative to the leader's proposal, reporting per chain how far the voter can support it, and may themselves attest fresh blocks beyond it. A transaction block disseminated at time $t$ is ordered by $t+3δ$ in expectation and $t+2δ$ at best, measured from the block's dissemination rather than the leader's proposal. Degradation under faults is graceful: a faulty producer delays only its own chain's blocks, costing other chains at most a one-view wait for placement. No leader can both finalise its leader block and exclude a fresh, well-circulated block of an honest chain. Consensus traffic is tens of kilobytes per view, independent of transaction volume.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

Comparison of Algebraic Block Multi-Coloring and Leiden Methods for Parallel Preconditioning in the ICCG Method

In the application of incomplete Cholesky preconditioning to the incomplete Cholesky-conjugate gradient (ICCG) method, forward and backward substitutions exhibit sequential dependencies that constitute a major bottleneck for parallelization in multicore environments. To alleviate this bottleneck, the algebraic block multi-coloring (ABMC) method achieves both parallelism and data locality through block-wise coloring. However, ABMC requires the number of blocks to be specified as an input parameter in advance. This study evaluates the Leiden method as an alternative blocking approach for parallel preconditioning in the ICCG method. As a community detection technique that maximizes a quality function for graph partitioning, the Leiden method automatically generates blocks that reflect the matrix structure without requiring the number of blocks a priori. We partition the adjacency graphs of sparse matrices using the Leiden method and utilize the resulting blocks for parallel preconditioning. We implement the Leiden method using modularity and the constant Potts model as quality functions and compare its performance with that of the ABMC method in terms of the number of iterations, execution time, and L2 cache efficiency across eight symmetric positive definite matrices. The experimental results demonstrate that the Leiden method with the constant Potts model achieves performance comparable to that of the ABMC method configured with an optimized number of blocks.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

ForgeStencil: Automating Per-Case Stencil Specialization from Kernels to 100+ Real Applications

Industrial and scientific computing rests on a few core kernels, and the stencil is among the most widely used: weather and climate models, seismic imaging, fluid dynamics, and image processing all run on it. No single stencil implementation is fastest: the optimal kernel changes qualitatively with stencil shape, grid shape, precision, and host application. For two decades the field has answered with general methods (DSLs, code generators, autotuners), because specialized solutions were too expensive to build per case, so all reuse one human-authored recipe. That reuse costs performance; we call the cost the generality tax. This premise no longer holds: code-synthesis agents now build a correct, specialized solution per case at acceptable cost. ForgeStencil automates this. A Kernel Agent synthesizes CUDA and forges a per-configuration map of specialized operators, removing the tax case by case. On an A100 the map beats the strongest public baseline in 37 of 37 cases: geometric mean 2.35x against same-precision f32 baselines and 1.95x for fp16, each reported under its own precision. The same change reaches end-to-end application performance. A generic operator library is tuned once for its own general case and reused across applications, so its shapes, layouts, and launch boundaries are optimal for none of them: using it is the application-level form of the tax. An App Agent instead forges a specialized solution per application, locating hotspots, rewriting application structure, and validating and integrating each change. Across 100 real industrial and scientific codes the end-to-end median speedup is 1.41x against each application's own GPU baseline. To our knowledge this is the first demonstration that per-case synthesis carries from a kernel library to complete applications at this breadth, and evidence that reuse is no longer the default in a domain built on it for two decades.

cs.DC↗