Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.07203

Embedding Modal Logics into Logics of Bunched Implications

Abstract

We present a new proof of the embedding of the classical modal logic S4 into the logic of Boolean Bunched Implications (BBI). While the original proof is semantical, this proof is entirely syntactical. It proceeds via Hilbert-style calculi, and is built by analogy with a recently discovered proof by Godel of the embedding of intuitionistic propositional logic into S4. We present the first full proofs of deduction theorems for BBI, which are used to show that the embedding is preserved by reasoning with assumptions, including where those assumptions are organised into bunches. Unlike the existing proof, our proof is stable under arbitrary axiomatic extensions of S4, and applies to all known axiomatic extensions of BBI in the literature. We observe how this embedding is related to semantical properties of both logics. Moreover, the proof extends gracefully to language extensions of BBI, as we show with hybrid BBI, classical BI, and sub-classical BBI.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniele Sansoni, Ranald Clouston. 2026-08-07. Embedding Modal Logics into Logics of Bunched Implications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07203

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deciding Predicate Logical Theories of Real-Valued Functions

The notion of a real-valued function is central to mathematics, computer science, and many other scientific fields. Despite this importance, there are hardly any positive results on decision procedures for predicate logical theories that reason about real-valued functions. This paper defines a first-order predicate language for reasoning about multi-dimensional smooth real-valued functions and their derivatives, and demonstrates that - despite the obvious undecidability barriers - certain positive decidability results for such a language are indeed possible.

cs.LO

Structural Liveness of Conservative Petri Nets

We show that the EXPSPACE-hardness result for structural liveness of Petri nets [Jancar and Purser, 2019] holds even for a simple subclass of conservative nets. As our main result, we prove that for structurally live conservative nets, the values of the minimal live markings are at most doubly exponential in the size of the net. This implies the EXPSPACE-completeness of structural liveness for conservative Petri nets. The result also applies to structurally bounded Petri nets, whereas the complexity of the general case remains open. As a proof ingredient of independent interest, we present an extension of known results on the bounds of minimal integer solutions to Boolean combinations of linear equalities, inequalities, and divisibility constraints.

cs.LO

Verifying Numerical Methods with Isabelle/HOL

Modern machine learning pipelines and ODE solvers are built on numerical algorithms. Reliable numerical methods are thus a prerequisite for trustworthy machine learning and cyber-physical systems. We evaluate a framework designed for verifying imperative programs and the Isabelle proof assistant as tools for proving the total correctness of four numerical algorithms: the bisection method, the fixed-point method, the perceptron, and the gradient descent algorithm. Our verifications required subtle extensions and generalisations to Isabelle's version of Taylor's theorem and higher-order derivatives. Finally, we reflect on the framework's automation, friendly syntax, and on further requirements to turn it into a verification tool for numerical methods.

cs.LO