Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.09546

Ultrametric Violation Distance: Polynomial Kernel and FPT Algorithm

Fedor V. Fomin·Petr A. Golovach·Yash Hiren More
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the Ultrametric Violation Distance problem, we are given a set of distances between $n$ points, and the goal is to modify the minimum number of distances so that the resulting set forms a valid ultrametric. In other words, the task is to fit an ultrametric to the given data, where the quality of the fit is measured by the $\ell_0$-norm of the error. While variants of this problem under the $\ell_\infty$ and $\ell_1$-norms have been well studied, the complexity of Ultrametric Violation Distance under the $\ell_0$-norm remained largely unexplored until recently. This changed with the work of Cohen-Addad, Fan, Lee, and Mesmay [FOCS 2022], who introduced a constant-factor approximation algorithm. Significant further progress on approximation algorithms was made in subsequent work by Charikar and Gao [SODA 2024], and by An, Kao, Lee, and Lee [FOCS 2025]. In this paper, we initiate a systematic study of Ultrametric Violation Distance from the perspectives of kernelization and fixed-parameter tractability (FPT). By the work of Fan, Gilbert, Raichel, Sonthalia, and Van Buskirk [SWAT 2020], the problem is known to be FPT when parameterized by the number of violated distances $k$. We show that the problem admits a kernel with $\mathcal{O}(k^2)$ points. Additionally, we present a single-exponential-time algorithm with running time $9^k \cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, which is asymptotically tight.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fedor V. Fomin, Petr A. Golovach, Yash Hiren More. 2026-08-10. Ultrametric Violation Distance: Polynomial Kernel and FPT Algorithm. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09546

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Beyond Kruskal: Polynomial-Time Tensor Decomposition under the Lovitz-Petrov Condition

Identifiability criteria certify that a given tensor decomposition is a unique rank decomposition. Kruskal's classical condition is one of the best-known deterministic criteria for identifiability. However, no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm is known under the Kruskal condition, and verifying the condition itself is NP-hard. Lovitz and Petrov introduced a strictly more general identifiability condition which, in contrast, is polynomial-time verifiable, but no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm was previously known under this condition. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for tensor decomposition under the Lovitz--Petrov condition. Moreover, combining our algorithm with polynomial-time verification of the Lovitz--Petrov condition yields an efficient end-to-end certification procedure: after computing a decomposition, one can deterministically certify in polynomial time that it is unique and therefore of minimum rank. This contrasts with an arbitrary tensor decomposition, which certifies only an upper bound on the tensor rank, while determining tensor rank is NP-hard in general.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Poisson Exchange Beyond Submodularity: Effective Approximation Algorithms for Offline and Online Subset Selection over Matroids

Over the past decade, a growing body of research has shown that $γ$-weak submodularity broadly arises in numerous subset selection tasks, including feature selection, neural network pruning, and video summarization. Despite its prevalence, maximizing a $γ$-weakly submodular function subject to a general matroid constraint remains challenging. To date, the only known approximation guarantee is the conservative $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ factor established by \citet{chen2018weakly}. To improve upon this result, this paper proposes a novel algorithm called \MGPE, which repeatedly performs maximum-gain local exchanges through careful control of a non-homogeneous Poisson clock, and proves that this \MGPE\ can attain an approximation ratio arbitrarily close to $ρ_γ=1-\left(γ/(2-γ)\right)^{ \frac{γ^2}{2(1-γ)} }$. In sharp contrast to the previous guarantee, our obtained factor $ρ_γ$ not only strictly improves upon $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ for every $γ\in(0,1]$, but also can asymptotically approach the optimal $(1-1/e)$-approximation for submodular maximization as $γ\to1$. Furthermore, we surprisingly find that when the matroid constraint reduces to a cardinality or the objective satisfies the stronger notion of $α$-weak DR-submodularity, \MGPE\ can automatically recover the tight approximation ratios of $1-e^{-γ}$ and $1-e^{-α}$, respectively. Here, $α\in(0,1]$ denotes the DR ratio.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Approximating Prize-Collecting TSP below 1.556

The prize-collecting traveling salesperson problem is a variant of the metric traveling salesperson problem in which vertices may be left unvisited by paying their associated penalties. The objective is to minimize the length of the tour plus the total penalty of the unvisited vertices. Blauth, Klein, and Nägele gave the previously best-known LP-relative $1.599$-approximation. We show that a simpler version of their algorithm, obtained by omitting the splitting-off preprocessing before the tree decomposition, has an LP-relative approximation ratio of $1.555761$. The improvement comes entirely from a new analysis of the parity-correction step: a simple analysis already gives $1.56$, and the stated factor follows from a numerical parameter search with exact verification.

cs.DS↗