Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.10283

A Kruskal Decision Procedure for Intuitionistic Modal Logic IK4

Abstract

We prove decidability of Simpson's intuitionistic modal logic IK$ by working directly with cut-free nested proofs. Once the end formula is fixed, only finitely many combinations of input and output formulae can occur at a node, although the modal tree itself remains unbounded. We order these nested sequents by rooted homeomorphic embedding: weakening may add input formulae, while transitivity allows a modal edge to be stretched into a non-empty path. Kruskal's theorem makes rooted homeomorphic embedding a well-quasi-order, but does not by itself make backward application of the rules effective: an inference may still occur inside an arbitrarily large context. The finite-support lemma shows that a minimal predecessor need retain only the positions used by the inference, the images of the chosen basis elements, and the branch points joining them. Together with an effective enumeration of bounded rule instances, this bound makes the minimal predecessors computable. Backward closure from the initial sequents gives an increasing sequence of finitely based upward-closed sets. The sequence eventually stabilises, and its stable value is the set of provable nested sequents. At that point, finitely many cut-free proofs suffice: every other provable nested sequent is obtained from one of them by weakening along an embedding. Their maximum height gives a uniform proof-height bound.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mario Piazza. 2026-08-10. A Kruskal Decision Procedure for Intuitionistic Modal Logic IK4. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10283

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Completeness of Kozen's Axiomatization for the Modal mu-Calculus: A Simple Proof

The modal mu-calculus, introduced by Dexter Kozen, is an extension of modal logic with fixpoint operators. Its axiomatization, Koz, was introduced at the same time and is an extension of the minimal modal logic K with the so-called Park fixpoint induction principle. It took more than a decade for the completeness of Koz to be proven, finally achieved by Igor Walukiewicz. However, his proof is fairly involved. In this article, we present an improved proof for the completeness of Koz which, although similar to the original, is simpler and easier to understand. Keywords: The modal mu-calculus, completeness, omega-automata.

cs.LO

Blurred Drinker Paradoxes and Blurred Choice Axioms: Constructive Reverse Mathematics of the Downward Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem

In the setting of constructive reverse mathematics, we analyse the downward Löwenheim-Skolem (DLS) theorem of first-order logic, stating that every infinite model has a countable elementary submodel. Refining the well-known equivalence of the DLS theorem to the axiom of dependent choice (DC) over classical base theories, our constructive approach allows for several finer logical decompositions: Just assuming countable choice (CC), the DLS theorem is equivalent to the conjunction of DC with a newly identified fragment of the excluded middle (LEM) that we call the blurred drinker paradox (BDP). Further without CC, the DLS theorem is equivalent to the conjunction of BDP with similarly blurred weakenings of DC and CC. Independently of their connection with the DLS theorem, we also study BDP and the blurred choice axioms on their own, for instance by showing that BDP is LEM without a contribution of Markov's principle and that blurred DC is DC without a contribution of CC. The paper is hyperlinked with an accompanying Coq development.

cs.LO

Algorithmic Unverifiability of Safety for Fixed and Recursively Self-Improving Systems

We establish mathematical limits of algorithmic safety verification for Turing-complete self-modifying systems, the class in which recursive self-improvement takes place, both for a fixed system and across its own modification. Statically, no verifier is sound, complete and tractable: over unbounded domains by Rice's and Gödel's theorems, over all finite configurations by Trakhtenbrot's theorem, and over succinctly described finite environments because verifying a policy against an adversary is coNP-complete and synthesising one is PSPACE-complete. Dynamically, we model one step of self-modification as a computable transformation of code and ask whether a safety property survives it. If the transformation depends only on behaviour, this is Rice's theorem one level up; if it reads the code, as self-modification does, the question is no longer semantic, yet the same s-m-n reduction works inside a class of behaviourally identical programs and inherits the halting degree. One step is never harder than the property; persistence along the whole trajectory can be $Π^0_2$-complete. Certification by a total algorithm is possible only for transformations of restricted expressivity, not merely for systems that stop changing. No tower of supervisors helps, and every total supervisor errs on an undecidable set of systems. For effectively pointwise properties, every faithful bounded scheme that certifies on finite behavioural evidence admits evolution traces certified at every stage while the property is violated. What survives is exact: a monitor that raises an alarm on violation semidecides it, and comparison against a frozen reference keeps the full theory.

cs.LO