Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.10877

Weighted First-Order Model Counting over Ordered Domains

Abstract

The Weighted First-Order Model Counting Problem (WFOMC) asks for the weighted sum of models of a first-order logical sentence over a domain. It is a fundamental problem in statistical relational learning, with applications extending to enumerative combinatorics and graph polynomials. Computing WFOMC for the three-variable fragment is $\mathsf{\#P}_1$-hard, whereas polynomial-time algorithms exist for the two-variable fragment and its extensions by cardinality constraints and counting quantifiers. In this work, we explore computing WFOMC in polynomial time over linearly ordered domains, enabling tractable reasoning across inference scenarios and combinatorial problems involving sequences. Because encoding a linear order in standard first-order logic requires three variables, negating our polynomial-time aspirations, we add a linear order axiom directly to the language. This forces one predicate to impose a total ordering on domain elements. We first prove that WFOMC with the linear order axiom can be solved in time polynomial in the domain size. We then extend this result to ordered domains with access to successor relations. While this holds when successors are explicitly defined via the linear order, we demonstrate an alternative implicit approach where successor relations are part of the axiom. This implicit method exhibits significantly better performance on all tested instances, sometimes providing exponential runtime improvements. Finally, we analyze scenarios with two distinct linear orders. We show that WFOMC over the two-variable fragment with two linear orders is $\mathsf{\#P}_1$-hard. However, we develop a polynomial-time algorithm for WFOMC with one linear order and a successor relation of another, pushing the intractability barrier further, yet still leaving the question of how close to a second full linear order one can get.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jan Tóth, Qipeng Kuang, Kuncheng Zou, Václav Kůla, Yuyi Wang, Yuanhong Wang, Ondřej Kuželka. 2026-08-11. Weighted First-Order Model Counting over Ordered Domains. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10877

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Differential Equations as Fixpoints and Games

Games and fixpoints are unified by proving that first-order game logic GL and the first-order modal mu-calculus L_mu are proved to be equiexpressive and equivalent, thereby fully aligning their expressive and deductive power. That is, there is a semantics-preserving translation from GL to L_mu, and vice versa. And both translations are provability-preserving, while equivalence with there-and-back-again roundtrip translations are provable in both calculi. This is to be contrasted with the propositional case, where game logic is strictly less expressive than the modal mu-calculus (without adding sabotage games). The extensions with differential equations, differential game logic (dGL) and differential modal mu-calculus, are also proved equiexpressive and equivalent. Moreover, as the continuous dynamics are definable by fixpoints or via games, ODEs can be axiomatized completely and, as a consequence, infinitesimally robust properties of ODEs can be decided via proof search. Rational gameplay provably collapses the games into single-player games to yield a strong arithmetical completeness theorem for dGL with rational-time ODEs.

cs.LO

Self-extensional logics of formal inconsistency: Decidability and limits for paraconsistency

RmbC is a self-extensional paraconsistent logic in the family of Logics of Formal Inconsistency (LFIs). This system is obtained from mbC (the basic LFI) by adding the replacement property via two global inference rules. RmbC is characterized by a non-explosive negation $\neg$ and a consistency operator $\circ$, which recovers the principle of explosion in a controlled way. Together with its principal axiomatic extensions, RmbC admits a standard Lindenbaum-Tarski algebraization, with Boolean algebras with LFI operators (BALFIs) as its algebraic semantics. In this paper, we study how far this self-extensional paraconsistent behavior can be extended axiomatically, starting from RmbC. We classify pairs of very natural consistency axioms according to whether they preserve paraconsistency or force classical collapse; identify six minimal explosive combinations that collapse to a single algebraic core; and isolate a separate structural obstruction for the combination of excluded middle for $\neg$ with an involutive negation. We also investigate, for the first time, the decidability of this family of self-extensional LFIs. As a first result, we prove the finite model property for RmbC with respect to BALFI semantics via an algebraic filtration, which yields decidability, and transfer this result to several paraconsistent axiomatic extensions of RmbC. Finally, we establish a coNEXPTIME upper bound for the validity problem of RmbC and a coNP-hardness lower bound, and prove coNP-completeness for the principal extensions containing one of the six minimal explosive pairs.

cs.LO

The Stochastic Target Discounted-Sum Problem

The target discounted-sum problem (TDS) asks, given a finite integer alphabet $Σ$, a rational discount factor $λ$, and a rational target $t$, whether some infinite sequence over $Σ$ has discounted sum exactly $t$. This problem remains open and underlies several open questions in automata theory, games, and Markov decision processes. We introduce and solve its stochastic counterpart, the stochastic target discounted-sum problem, which replaces existence by computation of the probability. We show that the probability that a random sequence generated by a finite Markov chain has discounted sum $t$ is rational and computable in pseudo-polynomial time. We further show how to decide, in polynomial time, whether the discounted-sum distribution of a Markov chain is atomless, and how to approximate to an arbitrary precision the probability that the discounted sum exceeds a rational threshold. Our techniques for the stochastic TDS problem allow us to make progress on TDS objectives in stochastic games, which are known to be as hard as the TDS problem. Restricting the maximizing player to finite-memory strategies, while allowing the minimizing player to use arbitrary strategies, we reduce the value problem and the synthesis problem to corresponding problems for safety objectives in stochastic games. This yields computable optimal values and deterministic optimal strategies with pseudo-polynomially bounded memory for stochastic games, and results in pseudo-polynomial-time algorithms for special cases of Markov decision processes and deterministic two-player games.

cs.LO