Exploring Students' Perceptions of Using Generative AI-Assisted Problem Posing

Lindsay Dawson; N. Sanjay Rebello

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.12523

Exploring Students' Perceptions of Using Generative AI-Assisted Problem Posing

Lindsay Dawson·N. Sanjay Rebello

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Problem posing, a pedagogical practice that asks students to generate novel problems or meaningful variations to problems encountered, supports transfer of learning and strengthens problem-solving skills in physics. However, generating physics problems can be challenging, particularly for novice learners. This study investigates students' perceptions of an approach to facilitate their use of Generative AI in ways that maximize their benefits and limit risks. Students were introduced to Generative AI-assisted problem posing as a self-study technique. This study utilizes a phenomenological approach to investigate students' perceptions on how training shaped AI interactions, attitudes towards problem posing with Generative AI, and how students view its incorporation into personal study practices. Results of this study suggest that students perceived a positive change in their interactions with Generative AI after receiving training on prompt engineering techniques. This study also reveals that students hold generally positive views towards the problem-posing technique, with a smaller subset of students showing hesitations towards using Generative AI. These results lay the foundation to introduce and employ training methods for Generative AI more widely and to continue to incorporate Generative AI into structured study techniques, like problem posing.

Explore related subjects

physics.ed-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Lindsay Dawson, N. Sanjay Rebello. 2026-08-12. Exploring Students' Perceptions of Using Generative AI-Assisted Problem Posing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12523

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Addressing misconceptions in university physics: A review and experiences from quantum physics educators

Students often begin physics courses with misconceptions rooted in everyday experience and intuition, which can be resistant to change. While research has identified strategies for addressing misconceptions across physics, it remains unclear whether different domains, like classical and quantum physics, require different approaches. Quantum concepts can pose different representational and mathematical demands, while both domains require instructors to elicit and develop students' reasoning. To support discussion of these instructional challenges, we organize selected literature on addressing misconceptions in physics education and summarize instructors' accounts. The overview groups 122 distinct works into four categories, with further subcategories. A preliminary framework developed from existing review literature informed the interview guide. We interviewed 12 instructors from the University of Waterloo's Institute for Quantum Computing and the Perimeter Institute, who have collectively taught over 100 quantum courses. The accounts describe difficulties involving instructional representations, prerequisite knowledge, and the interpretation of students' reasoning, alongside reported diagnostic and instructional responses. We draw these accounts and the literature together as questions for instructional planning. The report does not resolve the intended classical--quantum comparison or establish comparative instructional effectiveness.

physics.ed-ph↗

arXiv2026

Johann Bernoulli's analysis of elastic collisions (a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law thereby inspired)

In order to explain an elastic collision, Johann Bernoulli considered two bodies connected by a spring. Motion is defined as a succession of states of rest. Then, considering the spring to be a lever with a body at each extremity, the laws of equilibrium imply that `motion' is described by the time variation of the (common) quantity of motion of the bodies; the dynamic law is thus deduced. This inspires a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law (in one dimension) in introductory physics course; we call it ``bernoullian sequence''.

physics.ed-ph↗

arXiv2026

Design and Initial Evaluation of a Photovoltaics-focused Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience in Physics

Traditional physics laboratory courses often focus on experiments with well-known results, limiting students' engagement in authentic scientific practices. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), where students engage in real research with unknown outcomes, have been shown to support positive student outcomes, such as increased self-efficacy, persistence, and engagement in scientific practices. However, discipline-specific studies of CUREs in physics remain limited. We describe the development, structure, and initial implementation of a photovoltaics-focused CURE in a second-year undergraduate physics laboratory course at the University of Colorado Boulder. To examine how students experienced the course, we analyzed end-of-semester reflection assignments using the five CURE components (i.e., scientific practices, discovery, relevance, collaboration, and iteration), as well as established dimensions of research authenticity, as analytic frameworks. Students described experiences associated with all five CURE components, with collaboration, relevance, and scientific practices appearing most prominently in their reflections. Students also associated authentic research with meaningful scientific contribution, engagement in authentic scientific practices, and navigating the uncertainty and setbacks inherent in research, although fewer explicitly identified themselves as researchers or scientists. A subset of students additionally connected the course to their immediate thinking about future academic and professional pathways. This work contributes both a discipline-specific model for implementing CUREs in experimental physics laboratory courses and provides insight into how students interpret and experience authentic research within this course context.

physics.ed-ph↗