Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.13310

On the Structure of $(\min,+)$ Convolution

Abstract

The $(\min,+)$ convolution is a central problem in fine-grained complexity, and it remains open whether it can be computed in truly subquadratic time. We study it through tropical polynomials, where $(\min,+)$ convolution is exactly tropical polynomial multiplication. We introduce the tropical decomposition width, $\operatorname{tdw}(A)$, which measures how finely a tropical polynomial can be decomposed into factors of small degree. We prove two modular convexity theorems showing that bounded tropical decomposition width forces convexity on arithmetic progression subpolynomials. This yields deterministic algorithms for computing $a\otimes b$ in $$O\left(n\max(\operatorname{tdw}(a),\operatorname{tdw}(b))^2\right)$$ when $\max(\operatorname{tdw}(a),\operatorname{tdw}(b))$ is given, and in $$O\left(ne^{\min(\operatorname{tdw}(a),\operatorname{tdw}(b))(1+o(1))}\right)$$ without prior knowledge of the width. Neither algorithm requires a decomposition of the input sequences. The same structural ideas give a randomized algorithm for Multiple-Sequence $(\min,+)$ Convolution: given $k$ sequences of length at most $n$, their convolution can be computed in $$O\left(kn^2\sqrt{\min(k,n)}\log^{1.5}(kn)\right)$$ time, improving the natural $O(k^2n^2)$ bound. Finally, we introduce interpolation algebras for tropical polynomials and show that classes with bounded tropical decomposition width admit interpolation algebras of finite generating rank, whereas distinguishing all tropical polynomials of degree at most $n$ requires generating rank $\lfloor n/2\rfloor+1$. We also prove that tropical decomposition width cannot decrease under any flat $\mathbb T$-algebra extension. Together, these results connect the tractability of $(\min,+)$ convolution with structural rigidity in tropical polynomial multiplication.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Huanyi Zhou. 2026-09-04. On the Structure of $(\min,+)$ Convolution. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13310

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

It's Hard to PArcK

We show that Partizan Arc Kayles (PArcK), a generalization of Domineering to graphs, is PSPACE-complete via a reduction from Positive CNF and with recently-discovered techniques for creating PArcK positions with high temperature. The reduction uses only red and blue edges.

cs.CC

Improved Subexponential Upper Bounds for $3$-Restricted Matching Vector Families

Matching Vector families (MVFs) are defined by two ordered lists of vectors in $\mathbb{Z}_m^n$ whose inner products satisfy specific residue patterns modulo an integer $m$. Most famously, restricted MVFs are used to construct the best-known constant-query Locally Decodable codes (LDCs). We prove an upper bound of $2^{O\left(\sqrt{n\log n \log m}\right)}$ on the size of $3$-restricted MVFs in $\mathbb{Z}_m^n$ for $m \leq \sqrt{n}$, substantially improving on the previous best bound of $2^{O(n/\log n)}$ by Bhowmick, Dvir and Lovett (STOC'13, SICOMP'14). Our proof relies on a new polynomial method argument that controls collisions in sumsets of matching vectors.

cs.CC

Equality cases of the Stanley--Yan log-concave matroid inequality

The \emph{Stanley--Yan} (SY) \emph{inequality} gives the ultra-log-concavity for the numbers of bases of a matroid which have given sizes of intersections with $k$ fixed disjoint sets. The inequality was proved by Stanley (1981) for regular matroids, and by Yan (2023) in full generality. In the original paper, Stanley asked for equality conditions of the SY~inequality, and proved total equality conditions for regular matroids in the case $k=0$. In this paper, we completely resolve Stanley's problem. First, we obtain an explicit description of the equality cases of the SY inequality for $k=0$, extending Stanley's results to general matroids and removing the ``total equality'' assumption. Second, for $k\ge 1$, we prove that the equality cases of the SY inequality cannot be described in a sense that they are not in the polynomial hierarchy unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to a finite level.

math.CO