Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.14437

Intersection numbers for designs in regular semilattices

Abstract

We generalize intersection numbers for combinatorial designs to designs in finite meet-semilattices satisfying suitable regularity conditions. While designs in regular semilattices go back to Delsarte, our regularity assumptions are weaker than his and need not give rise to an association scheme. In this framework, we extend Mendelsohn's equations, prove a generalized Singleton bound with Steiner systems as equality cases, and determine the block intersection distribution at any block of a Steiner system. In particular, this distribution is independent of the chosen block. Specializing to several classical semilattice families, our results recover a number of well-known distributions in coding and design theory. In the Hamming and the $q$-Hamming (or bilinear forms) schemes, they give the local distance distributions of MDS and MRD codes, respectively. In the Johnson and $q$-Johnson (or Graßmann) schemes, they reproduce the block intersection distribution of classical and $q$-analog Steiner systems, equivalently the distance distribution of diameter-perfect constant-weight codes and diameter-perfect constant-dimension subspace codes. For the $q$-Johnson schemes, to the best of our knowledge, this result is new. As a further illustration, we apply our theory to designs of perfect matchings. Our approach provides a unified treatment of these cases in the strongest form known in the literature, determining the distribution relative to each individual block or codeword, without averaging and without linearity or additivity assumptions. Moreover, it identifies the natural double-counting objects underlying these distributions, leading to formulas in the regularity parameters of the semilattice and avoiding the more cumbersome expressions that arise in eigenvalue-based approaches via the ambient association scheme.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael Kiermaier, Lukas Klawuhn. 2026-08-14. Intersection numbers for designs in regular semilattices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14437

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO