Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.15713

YOLO26-RD: An End-to-End Road Damage Detection Network With Learnable Contrast Enhancement and Edge-Guided Downsampling

Abstract

Pavement distress detectors are conventionally specialised for small objects, typically by adding a stride-4 detection head and replacing strided convolution with space-to-depth downsampling. This paper tests that premise against the annotation geometry of region level survey imagery and finds it fails: 1.28% of instances are small at 640 resolution while 70.37% are large, yet a stride-4 level would claim 75.3% of anchors, and complete misses rather than localisation errors dominate baseline failures. YOLO26-RD therefore reallocates the anchor budget, retaining the stride-4 branch as neck features but carrying no detection level there, and adds LearnableContrast, a 494 parameter per tile correction learned from the detection loss and active at inference, and EdgeSPD, a lossless space-to-depth downsampler gated by a fixed Sobel prior. Fifteen models were trained from scratch under one recipe, five scales each of YOLO26-RD and of matched YOLO26 and YOLOv12 families. Averaged over scales YOLO26-RD returns 0.790 mAP50 and 0.482 mAP50-95 against 0.776 and 0.471 for YOLO26 and 0.755 and 0.468 for YOLOv12; it exceeds both on mAP50 at every scale from s upward, and at m, l and x it leads on both metrics, twelve pairwise comparisons decided without exception. YOLO26-RD-l is the best of the fifteen at 0.809 mAP50 and 0.497 mAP50-95, improving on the YOLO26 reference by 0.031 and 0.030 and leading all six per class entries; every arm of a module ablation also exceeds that reference. The margin is thus a property of the architecture rather than of one tuned configuration, though three of the twelve margins lie inside the dataset 0.015 resolution limit and the held out split reproduces the ordering against YOLO26 but not YOLOv12 at scale x. As a TensorRT FP16 engine the released model sustains 98 frames per second on an entry level accelerator, against the 21 needed at 100 km/h.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sompote Youwai, Pawarotorn Chaipetch, Hathairat Samaikul, Theerayut Yonseng. 2026-08-18. YOLO26-RD: An End-to-End Road Damage Detection Network With Learnable Contrast Enhancement and Edge-Guided Downsampling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15713

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV