Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.16190

Decorrelation Is Not Complementarity: Skill, Not Lineage, Governs Trusted-Monitor Ensembles

Anik Jha
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Trusted monitoring has a cheap, trusted model score a stronger untrusted model's actions, and a diverse ensemble of them beats a single stronger monitor at matched cost. They are built by minimising average pairwise correlation, and that paper's twelve monitors shared one base model, leaving open what supplies the diversity. We study 24 open-weight monitors spanning nine pretraining lineages and a 29x range of detection skill (pAUC at 10 percent FPR, 0.028 to 0.803) on backdoored code. The metric used to build panels does not predict what a panel is for, and we can say why. Agreement on attack items splits into a shared-detectability signal component and an idiosyncratic error component, which predict ensemble gain with opposite sign (Spearman -0.25 and +0.26), so their sum, the metric actually used, predicts it barely at all (+0.05); the cancellation holds in 7 of 8 evaluations. Skill acts on signal (+0.53) while error stays flat (-0.01), which is why a monitor's own skill predicts its agreement with the pool (Spearman 0.84, n = 24, permutation p below 0.0001). Pretraining lineage is the obvious way to buy decorrelation, and it does not pay. At matched member capability, cross-lineage panels detect no better (permutation p = 0.13), and lineage barely moves the metric either (+0.064, p = 0.18). We report that against ourselves: on our own 22-monitor pool the same test read +0.104 at p = 0.037 until two monitors were added. An earlier pool topping out at pAUC 0.23 had already invalidated another analysis. Such a quantity is a property of the pool assembled. Panel gain over the best member falls monotonically with panel skill (-0.66 at k = 2, -0.70 at k = 3), and no correlation-weighted selection beats picking the single best monitor out of sample. Across six attacker models the gain result holds in all six, the agreement and cancellation results in five of six.

Explore related subjects

cs.CRcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anik Jha. 2026-08-17. Decorrelation Is Not Complementarity: Skill, Not Lineage, Governs Trusted-Monitor Ensembles. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16190

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Starfish: Rebalancing Multi-Party Off-Chain Payment Channels

Blockchain technology has revolutionized the way transactions are executed, but scalability remains a major challenge. Payment Channel Network (PCN), as a Layer-2 scaling solution, has been proposed to address this issue. However, skewed payments can deplete the balance of one party within a channel, restricting the ability of PCNs to transact through a path and subsequently reducing the transaction success rate. To address this issue, the technology of rebalancing has been proposed. However, existing rebalancing strategies in PCNs are limited in their efficiency and applicability under realistic network topologies. Cycle-based approaches only enable rebalancing among nodes that form cycles, while non-cycle-based approaches incur high on-chain operation costs. In this study, we propose Starfish, a rebalancing approach designed for the locally star-like structures formed by high-degree routing hubs and their incident channels in real-world PCNs. By leveraging a hub-centric structure, Starfish reduces the on-chain overhead of rebalancing from quadratic to linear in the number of channels, achieving high rebalancing efficiency. We formally prove the security of Starfish and conduct comparative experiments against existing rebalancing techniques to demonstrate its effectiveness.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Proof-of-Authorship for Diffusion-based AI Generated Content

Recent advancements in AI-generated content (AIGC) have introduced new challenges in intellectual property protection and the authentication of generated objects. We focus on scenarios in which an author seeks to assert authorship of an object generated using latent diffusion models (LDMs), in the presence of adversaries who attempt to falsely claim authorship of objects they did not create. While proof-of-ownership has been studied in the context of multimedia content through techniques such as time-stamping and watermarking, these approaches face notable limitations. In contrast to traditional content creation sources (e.g., cameras), the LDM generation process offers greater control to the author. Specifically, the random seed used during generation can be deliberately chosen. By binding the seed to the author's identity using cryptographic functions, the author can assert to be the creator of the object. We refer to this stronger guarantee as proof-of-authorship, since only the creator of the object can legitimately claim the object. This contrasts with proof-of-ownership via time-stamping or watermarking, where any entity could potentially claim ownership of an object by being the first to timestamp or embed the watermark. We propose a proof-of-authorship framework involving a probabilistic adjudicator who quantifies the probability that a claim is false. Furthermore, unlike prior approaches, the proposed framework does not involve any secret. We explore various attack scenarios and analyze design choices using Stable Diffusion 2.1 and XL as representative case studies.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Impact Analysis of Speech Representation Learning Models for Acoustic Side-Channel Attack

Acoustic side-channel attacks (ASCA) on keyboards have gained increasing attention, yet impact of speech representation learning models in ASCA remains unexplored. Addressing this, we introduce KEYAC, a dataset designed to analyze representation generalization for ASCA under both standard and VoIP codec settings. On KEYAC, we evaluate six representation learning models under zero-shot and partial fine-tuning settings using fully connected and convolutional networks. Results show that while partial fine-tuning improves performance, models struggle to generalize across VoIP codecs. We hypothesize this limitation stems from inadequate modeling of nonlinear feature interactions in conventional fine-tuning architectures. To address this, we employ Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) for fine-tuning. Empirical results show that KAN-based fine-tuning consistently outperforms the baselines and establishes a new state-of-the-art on KEYAC.

cs.CR↗