Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.18340

Matchings and product growth in modular abelian independence groups

Abstract

We unify two matching theories, one for finite subsets of groups and the other for finite-dimensional subspaces in a field extension. To achieve this, we study groups equipped with a compatible finitary matroid structure, termed here independence groups. Applying Rado's independent transversal theorem, we derive necessary and sufficient rank criteria for matchability between finite-rank sets. In the setting of a modular abelian independence group $G$, we develop an analogue of the $e$-transform from additive number theory, derive structural matching criteria, and characterize a global matching property by the absence of a finite-rank submonoid $H$ satisfying $1<ρ(H)<ρ(G)$, where $ρ$ denotes rank. Examples of modular abelian independence groups are given and examined in the matching context. Arising from this matching theory, but formulated without any reference to it, is a product-growth bound that generalizes the Cauchy--Davenport theorem: we define a parameter $μ(G)$ and prove that $ρ(XY)\geq \min\{μ(G),ρ(X)+ρ(Y)-1\}$ for all nonempty finite-rank subsets $X,Y$ of $G$. Furthermore, $ρ(XY)$ is shown to be controlled from below by a submonoid of $G$ that stabilizes a flat, a phenomenon reminiscent of Kneser's theorem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mohsen Aliabadi, Jozsef Losonczy. 2026-09-19. Matchings and product growth in modular abelian independence groups. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18340

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO