Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.18461

Wilf Equivalence for Length-Three Patterns and Flat POPs, and a Conjecture of Qiu and Remmel

Abstract

It is well known that, for each classical pattern $τ$ of length 3, the number of $τ$-avoiding permutations of length $n$ is the $n$th Catalan number, and numerous bijections between different length-three avoidance classes have been constructed and studied. In this paper, we refine this classical problem by studying Wilf equivalence among permutations that simultaneously avoid a classical pattern of length three and a flat partially ordered pattern. Partially ordered patterns (POPs) provide a flexible framework for encoding families of classical permutation patterns. For $\ell\geq 3$ and $1\leq x\leq\ell$, let $P_{\ell,x}$ be the length-$\ell$ POP in which the entry at position $x$ is required to be smaller than all the other entries, while no relations are imposed among the remaining entries. Such POPs are called flat POPs. We classify the Wilf equivalences among all pairs $(τ,P_{\ell,x})$, where $τ$ is a classical pattern of length three. For every $\ell\geq4$, the resulting $6\ell$ pairs form exactly $2\ell-1$ Wilf equivalence classes, while the exceptional case $\ell=3$ gives four classes. Our proofs combine the derivation of explicit formulas and recurrence relations with the construction of bijections. Moreover, we introduce novel prime-divisor arguments to distinguish the remaining candidate classes, reducing the problem to showing that a certain Diophantine equation has no solutions for $\ell\ge 3{,}274$, where the bound $3{,}274$ is not claimed to be sharp. Finally, by extending our work on POPs, we resolve a conjecture of Qiu and Remmel concerning the distribution of quadrant marked mesh patterns on 132-avoiding permutations and correct an error in their paper that is crucial to the proof.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shiqi Cao, Sergey Kitaev, Yuxin Wu. 2026-08-19. Wilf Equivalence for Length-Three Patterns and Flat POPs, and a Conjecture of Qiu and Remmel. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18461

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO