Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2608.18492

From the Square-Energy Conjecture to Signed Graphs: Sharp Bounds for Positive Square Energy

Abstract

Let $Σ=(G,σ)$ be a connected signed graph of order $n$ and size $m$, and let $s^{+}(Σ)$ and $s^{-}(Σ)$ denote the sums of the squares of its positive and negative adjacency eigenvalues, respectively. The square-energy conjecture of Elphick, Farber, Goldberg, and Wocjan states that every connected graph $G$ of order $n$ satisfies \[ \min\{s^{+}(G),s^{-}(G)\}\ge n-1. \] Liu and Ning~\cite{LiuNing2023} published a wide-ranging paper entitled ``Unsolved Problems in spectral graph theory", and this conjectures were placed first in their list of such problems. We prove that every signature $σ$ of a connected graph $G$ satisfies the sharp bound \[ s^{+}(Σ)\le 2m-n+1. \] For the all-positive signing this gives $s^{+}(G)\le 2m-n+1$, whereas for the all-negative signing it gives $s^{-}(G)\le 2m-n+1$. Since $s^{+}(G)+s^{-}(G)=2m$, these two special cases imply the square-energy conjecture; the present theorem is stronger in scope because the same bound holds for every signing of $G$. Applying the theorem to the negation $-Σ$ also yields \[ s^{+}(Σ)\ge n-1. \] Both bounds are sharp. The proof is based on a doubly nonnegative matrix inequality. We also shorten the proof of that inequality by replacing its final case distinction with a fixed convex combination.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fu-Tao Hu, Xiao Han. 2026-08-19. From the Square-Energy Conjecture to Signed Graphs: Sharp Bounds for Positive Square Energy. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18492

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO↗

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO↗

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO↗