Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.20880

Live Artifacts: Authoring Dynamic Media via Live Layers Encapsulating Generative Specifications

Abstract

We frame Live Artifacts as a class of persistent generative media between static assets and interactive software. Unlike conventional generative outputs that collapse into static files, Live Artifacts retain their generative logic as a persistent media property, enabling continuous context-dependent regeneration. Time, location, or live data become part of their generative specifications, initiating coordinated updates across modalities (e.g., adapting text, visuals, and audio together) while preserving composition, semantics, identity, and cross-modal coherence. To facilitate experimentation with this medium, we present LiveCanvas, an authoring system that reconceptualizes visual layers as live generative specifications with explicit mutability and constrained dependencies. Creators orchestrate dynamic behaviors and manage generative persistence within a visual canvas rather than through programming, defining what remains stable, what can change, and how changes propagate. We evaluate Live Artifacts through a gallery of responsive examples and a qualitative study with six professionals, finding that LiveCanvas facilitates a shift from composing static outputs to crafting responsive generative artifacts while remaining aligned with familiar authoring practices.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Leixian Shen, Haotian Li, Hugo Romat, Fanny Chevalier, Nicolai Marquardt, Nathalie Riche. 2026-08-21. Live Artifacts: Authoring Dynamic Media via Live Layers Encapsulating Generative Specifications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20880

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Are explainable AI (XAI) evaluation strategies aligned? Comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical evaluation measures using saliency maps

The evaluation of explainable AI (XAI) approaches often relies on three families of methods: subjective measures (e.g., questionnaires on trust or satisfaction), objective measures (e.g., task performance metrics), and mathematical metrics (e.g., for faithfulness). Yet, it remains unclear how these families align or diverge in practice. In a{preregistered} between-subjects study (N=166), we use three established saliency map techniques (LIME, Grad-CAM, Guided Backpropagation) as a testbed to examine this issue. We find that each family of methods leads to different conclusions: participants reported no differences in trust or satisfaction, Grad-CAM improved user performance, while mathematical metrics favored Guided Backpropagation. At the same time, mathematical metrics were only partially related to user performance, and these relationships were sometimes counterintuitive. Our findings highlight the methodological importance of comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical approaches when evaluating XAI, illustrating both tensions and aspects that are aligned. We discuss implications for XAI evaluation frameworks.

cs.HC

Mind Your Ps and Qs: Positive Moderation Practice in the Positive Queue

Online communities rely on volunteer moderators to maintain order. Despite their key role, moderators are given a toolbox of punishments and far less support for encouraging contributions they want to see more of. We introduce the Positive Queue as a positive counterpart to Reddit's modqueue: a dedicated space for moderators to discover contributions and behaviors they want to encourage and positively reinforce. With five moderators, four with 6-14 years of experience, we use the Positive Queue to examine how moderators operationalize positive reinforcement. Moderators combined predicted community reception, observed engagement, and their own judgment; used prediction-engagement mismatches to identify overlooked content; and repurposed positive features for punitive and retrospective work. These findings surface tensions around labor, attribution, and community fit. We contribute the Positive Queue as a working system and conceptualize positive moderation as recognition infrastructure that shapes what moderators notice, whose judgment becomes visible, and how recognition reaches contributors.

cs.HC

PILOT: Control Surfaces for Authoring Social Media Feeds

Personalized social media feeds infer preferences from behavior, leaving people little direct control over what they see. Existing controls range from post-level reactions to rules and natural language, but little is known about how people use them together or how added expressiveness changes effort. We built PILOT, a Bluesky feed-authoring system that turns in-feed actions into explicit preferences, deterministic ranking, and inspectable outcomes. A study with seven participants informed an expanded implementation, which we organized into three nested control surfaces that ten participants compared within subjects. Participants assigned controls to distinct jobs: broad controls set direction, in-post actions refined results, and filters removed content. Richer surfaces did not necessarily feel more effortful, and participants' experiences depended more on whether they could verify and repair outcomes. Our findings show that usable feed control requires not simply more controls, but orchestration across mechanisms that support expression, inspection, repair, and episodic use.

cs.HC