Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.21793

Target-Dependent Local Verification: Information--Proof-Length Tradeoffs

Abstract

We study fixed-layout local verification with target-dependent local tests. Let $M$ be a random variable on $\{0,1\}^K$, and let $S$ record the test selected at each coordinate. For each $s\in\operatorname{supp}(S)$, let $F_s$ be the corresponding target fiber and set $D_{\mathrm{fib}}=\max_s\operatorname{VCdim}(F_s)$. We prove $H(M\mid S)\le \log_2\!\left(\sum_{j=0}^{D_{\mathrm{fib}}}\binom Kj\right)$. A fiber that shatters $d$ coordinates yields a weak relaxed locally decodable code with message length $d$ and block length $d+P$ over the original proof alphabet. For a uniform $K$-bit target and fixed proof alphabet, $Q$, and $σ$, the Goldberg--Gur--Saraogi lower bound implies that $I(M;S)\leγK$, for fixed $γ<1$, forces $P=Ω\!\left(K^{1+1/a}/(\log K)^{2+2/a}\right)$, where $a=\lceil Q/σ\rceil$. If $P\le K(\log K)^c$, then $I(M;S)\ge K-O\!\left(K^{a/(a+1)}(\log K)^{3+ac/(a+1)}\right)=K-o(K)$. Any discrete verifier state $T$ determining $S$ satisfies the same information lower bound. Bounded-randomness adaptive branches can be simulated nonadaptively by exposing their decision trees. A branch using at most $r$ random bits and $q$ adaptive proof queries yields a decoder with perfect completeness and at most $1+2^{r+1}\sum_{j<q}A^j$ queries. Under $I(M;S)\leγK$, near-linear proof length requires this quantity to be $Ω(\log K/\log\log K)$; the binary one-query case gives $P=2^{Ω(K)}$. Applied to a global list-sound dPCP interface of Gur--Minzer--Weissenberg--Zheng, our bound shows that a fixed target-independent menu of $L$ test profiles must satisfy $\log_2L\ge K-o(K)$. Proof-dependent lists and additional target-dependent selection data must be included in the measured state.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hongmin Li. 2026-08-22. Target-Dependent Local Verification: Information--Proof-Length Tradeoffs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21793

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC