Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.22135

GrOIL: Graph-Grounded Domain Ontology Induction with Constrained LLM Mediation

Maruf Ahmed Mridul·Abid Talukder·Oshani Seneviratne
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Constructing formal ontologies from domain documents requires simultaneously enforcing corpus grounding, vocabulary consistency, axiom-level expressivity, and end-to-end provenance, a combination no existing automatic system delivers. We present a seven-stage graph-grounded pipeline that converts domain documents into a complete, auditable Web Ontology Language (OWL) Terminological Box (TBox) without any unconstrained generation step. Documents are first encoded as Unified Discourse-Hypergraphs (UDH) capturing entity participation and discourse dependencies; subsequent stages transform this graph evidence into a class hierarchy, typed object and datatype properties, and restriction axioms, with Large Language Model (LLM) usage restricted to narrow, graph-grounded mediation tasks. A paired Assertional Box (ABox) population procedure grounds named individuals in the induced TBox, enabling SPARQL-based functional evaluation. Every emitted term carries a full decision chain from raw source passages through each pipeline stage, making the TBox directly auditable and suitable for targeted human refinement. Evaluated on the life insurance domain using two established benchmarks and a new 100-contract corpus spanning ten product types, our pipeline achieves strong results across all evaluation dimensions, outperforming direct and multi-agent LLM baselines on competency-question (CQ) coverage (0.85 vs. 0.63 and 0.62 on one term-life contract; 0.77 vs. 0.40 and 0.44 on another contract), while also attaining high keyphrase coverage comparable to a manually-constructed reference ontology and strong performance on structured gap-and-overlap reasoning, all without any manual TBox engineering. Ontology growth analysis provides evidence consistent with vocabulary saturation at scale, demonstrating that the pipeline produces stable, reusable domain representations from large document corpora.

Explore related subjects

cs.IR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maruf Ahmed Mridul, Abid Talukder, Oshani Seneviratne. 2026-08-22. GrOIL: Graph-Grounded Domain Ontology Induction with Constrained LLM Mediation. https://doi.org/10.1145/3799682.3840910

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

WebArxiv: A Reproducible Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal Web Agents on arXiv Tasks

Foundation models now enable autonomous agents to interact with real-world websites, but existing benchmarks emphasize general-purpose browsing, underrepresent research-oriented environments and scholarly discovery workflows, and often depend on live sites whose changing content and structure undermine reproducibility. arXiv provides a realistic, reproducible, hierarchically structured, information-centric testbed without privacy-sensitive interactions. We introduce WebArxiv, a static-snapshot benchmark comprising 510 time-invariant tasks, each with a unique deterministic ground truth. Its diverse, realistic scholarly tasks go beyond simple information lookup and rule following to emphasize multi-constraint paper retrieval, fine-grained content extraction, and cross-paper comparison. Evaluations of a range of foundation-model-based web agents show that WebArxiv remains challenging. Behavioral analysis reveals that agents over-rely on fixed interaction histories, causing incomplete or repetitive reasoning. We therefore equip agents with a lightweight dynamic-memory mechanism for adaptive retrieval and reasoning over relevant context. The benchmark and code are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/74E4423BVNW/README.md.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

GreekBarRetrieval: A Benchmark for Greek Statutory Retrieval

Statutory retrieval is necessary for citation-grounded legal question answering, but remains underexplored for Greek. We introduce GreekBarRetrieval, a public retrieval benchmark derived from, and complementing GreekBarBench, which did not include retrieval. The new benchmark comprises 283 bar-exam questions, each accompanied by the facts of the case it refers to, and 6,308 candidate statutory articles to retrieve from. Questions and facts are stated in everyday language, but need to be mapped to the formal terminology of statutes and their abstract legal concepts. A further complication is that not all of the case facts are relevant to each question of a case. Experimenting with three BM25 variants and nine dense retrievers, we find that vanilla dense retrieval far outperforms vanilla sparse retrieval in Recall@100. However, LLM-based query reformulation helps BM25 close that gap, while also improving dense retrieval. With a ten-round ReAct-like LLM reformulation loop that we introduce, BM25 improves further in Recall@100 and obtains the best nDCG and MAP scores of all tested retrievers. Query reformulation also outperforms pseudo-relevance feedback, sparse-dense fusion, and English translation.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

Parameterized Dense-Sparse Fusion for Hybrid Retrieval: Tuning a Rank-Score Mix on BEIR SciFact with Qdrant

We study a parameterized hybrid ranker that fuses a dense embedding list and a sparse lexical list. The method has a small, explicit parameter vector: a dense prior $α\in [0,1]$, a score-versus-rank mix $λ\in [0,1]$, an RRF smoothing parameter $κ> 0$, optional list-geometry coefficients that move $α$ per query, and a router margin $τ$ that can turn sparse search off. We grid-search those ranges on SciFact train (809 queries) and freeze the chosen values on SciFact test (300). The tuned rank-score mix ($α= 0.8$, $λ= 0.75$, $κ= 20$) reaches 0.753 nDCG@10 and 0.889 recall@10, outperforming dense BGE (0.742 / 0.871) and equal-weight RRF (0.707 nDCG@10) on that test split. A list-conditioned $α$ adds +0.0006 nDCG; a sparse-off router is rejected by the same train split (any $τ$ that skipped approximately 50% of queries lost nDCG). These coefficients are dataset-specific. Equal RRF with the same models does not beat dense on a nine-zip BEIR macro-average (0.479 vs. 0.519 nDCG@10). Repeating the same train-then-freeze sweep independently on all 20 indexed units beats equal RRF on 20/20 and dense on 16/20 (unit-mean nDCG@10 0.467 vs. 0.462 dense vs. 0.420 RRF). Other corpora should reuse the ranges, not a copy of the SciFact point.

cs.IR↗