Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.22819

Direct, Parallel, or Sequential? A Comparative Study of Training-Free Multi-Subject Image-to-Video Generation

Yanliang Qi·Kexi Chen·Muchao Ye·Haomiao Ni
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Text-conditioned image-to-video (I2V) generation has advanced rapidly, yet generating videos with multiple subjects remains challenging. A model must simultaneously preserve the appearance of each subject, assign distinct motions, and maintain coherent spatial and temporal interactions. This paper presents a systematic study of three representative paradigms for training-free multi-subject I2V generation: direct, parallel, and sequential generation. Direct generation applies a pretrained I2V model to the complete reference image and prompt, requiring all subjects and motions to be synthesized jointly. Parallel and sequential generation instead decompose the reference image and prompt into subject-specific visual and textual conditions. Parallel generation synthesizes each subject independently and subsequently composes the resulting videos, reducing the complexity of each generation step at the cost of weaker inter-subject context. Sequential generation first synthesizes a background video and then progressively introduces individual subjects. This preserves accumulated scene context but introduces sensitivity to subject ordering and error propagation. We empirically evaluate the three paradigms across diverse multi-subject scenes, comparing appearance preservation, motion fidelity, temporal consistency, and inter-subject coherence, while also characterizing their distinct failure modes. Our findings reveal the strengths and limitations of each paradigm and offer practical insights for designing controllable multi-subject video generation systems.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yanliang Qi, Kexi Chen, Muchao Ye, Haomiao Ni. 2026-08-24. Direct, Parallel, or Sequential? A Comparative Study of Training-Free Multi-Subject Image-to-Video Generation. https://doi.org/10.1145/3841458.3841542

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV↗