Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.23060

Atomic Common-Day Invoice Clearing under Causal Daily Scheduling: Path-Enabled and Bounded-Cycle Policies

Abstract

Late payment propagates working-capital pressure through supply networks because firms are simultaneously creditors and debtors. We develop an atomic-record temporal invoice-graph method for path-enabled clearing and compares it with complete-candidate bounded-cycle netting under a causal daily greedy schedule. Each invoice remains a residual record with its issue date, due date, amount, and identifier. A candidate is executable through source capacity active on every supporting edge on one common day. A non-bilateral two-edge path reduces two invoice legs, creates a direct settlement instruction between the endpoints, and preserves net positions for all participants on the combined invoice-plus-instruction state; payable-mass reduction is distinguished from invoice compression. The empirical sequence contains 749,952 invoices issued from 2012 through 2023, totalling EUR99.7 billion, and maintains one rolling state across annual boundaries so bridge invoices are introduced once and residual balances continue. Path clearing reduces 48.2% of issue-cohort mass, compared with 43.3% for length-eight cycle netting, an advantage of EUR4.841 billion and 4.855 percentage points. It leads materially in ten cohorts, is practically tied in 2013, and trails in 2012. The result survives alternative ordering, mixed path-cycle policies, cycle-length sensitivity, component resampling, acceleration constraints, and fragment replay. In reciprocal 2022, where almost all local paths lie in the cyclic core, path clearing still leads. Tractable full-information linear programs show path advantage and path-cycle complementarity. The findings establish a policy-level benefit, not global optimality or welfare dominance,and motivate future asynchronous agent-to-agent clearing built around deterministic common-day verification,private mandates,reservations, explicit consent,and atomic commit.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peplluis Esteva de la Rosa, Sai Srikanth Madugula. 2026-08-25. Atomic Common-Day Invoice Clearing under Causal Daily Scheduling: Path-Enabled and Bounded-Cycle Policies. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23060

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

User Influence Analysis Based on Blogs

Rumor and word of mouth spread at the same speed as the highway of information diffusion in the age of the internet. Social networks play quite an important role in the huge internet. Nowadays, social networks have become indispensable in our lives, especially for the government and enterprises. A social network becomes a complex information diffusion network with users working as nodes and the relationships between users working as the vehicle. In this paper, we propose three kinds of algorithms for computing user influence based on the behavior of a user's forwarding microblogs and the symbol of @ in microblogs. We evaluate the effectiveness of the algorithms by comparing the results of our work with the training data in the dataset, and in the end, it proves that our algorithms work well.

cs.SI

Location transparency reduces activity by accounts misrepresenting their location on X

Concerns about inauthentic accounts, including foreign actors posing as domestic voices, are central to debates about online discourse. Yet, little is known about accounts with inaccurate location claims and how they behave when discrepancies between their claimed and actual locations become publicly visible. In November 2025, X introduced an "About this account" feature that discloses each account's platform-inferred location of operation. We leverage this intervention in a large-scale quasi-experimental study of 8,200 politically engaged accounts claiming a U.S. location, comparing accounts whose disclosed locations matched versus contradicted their claims across 1.3 million posts and 3.6 million replies over 21 weeks. Before disclosure, location-mismatched accounts posted more misleading, scam-related, and cryptocurrency-related content, but showed no distinctive partisan leaning. Difference-in-differences estimates show that disclosure reduced the posting activity of location-mismatched accounts by 13.1% with the largest declines among accounts revealed to be in Africa (29.2%) and Asia (24.4%), and among accounts with VPN flags, username changes, or scam- and crypto-heavy content. Additionally, the decline in their replies was concentrated in interactions with U.S.-based recipients (10.3%), whereas replies to non-U.S.-based recipients showed no statistically significant change. Conversely, there was no significant change in average audience engagement with their posts. Location transparency thus works primarily by inducing restraint among the disclosed accounts rather than by shifting audience behaviour, and the accounts it constrains look at least as much like cross-border fraud as foreign political influence.

cs.SI

The Benefit of Collective Intelligence in Community-Based Content Moderation is Limited by Overt Political Signalling

Social media platforms face increasing scrutiny over the rapid spread of misinformation. In response, many have adopted community-based content moderation systems, including Community Notes (formerly Birdwatch) on X (formerly Twitter), Community Notes on Meta, and Footnotes on TikTok. However, research shows that the current design of these systems can allow political biases to influence both the development of notes and the rating processes, reducing their overall effectiveness. We hypothesise that enabling users to collaborate on writing notes, rather than relying solely on individually authored notes, can enhance the overall quality of their notes. To test this idea, we conducted an online experiment in which participants jointly authored notes on politically misleading posts. We find that collaboration improves the helpfulness of notes, although the average effect depends on the interactional context. In particular, the benefits of collaboration decline when participants are made aware of one another's political affiliations. We also find that politically diverse teams improve note quality when evaluating Republican posts, while team composition does not meaningfully affect note quality for Democrat posts. These findings underscore the complexity of community-based content moderation and highlight the importance of understanding group dynamics and political diversity when designing more effective moderation systems.

cs.SI