arXiv · 2608.24802
Sparse domination implies convex body domination
Abstract
We prove that sparse domination of a bilinear form implies convex body domination. More precisely, if a bilinear form admits an $(r,s)$-sparse bound, then its coordinate-wise extension to $\mathbb C^n$-valued functions admits an $(r,s)$-convex body sparse bound. The proof relies on a randomization argument. We establish the result both for sparse families in a fixed dyadic lattice and for sparse families of arbitrary cubes. As an application, we deduce sparse domination for iterated commutators, with the local oscillations of the symbol appearing in the sparse form.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Aapo Laukkarinen, Emiel Lorist. 2026-08-25. Sparse domination implies convex body domination. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24802
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.