Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.26208

Learning Interpretable Tumor Microenvironment Representations by Fitting Pan-Cancer Cell State-Niche Correlation

Abstract

In the tumor microenvironment, cell's state is influenced by cell-cell interactions (CCIs) with neighboring cells in its niches. Identifying dysregulated CCIs that are associated with pathogenic process pinpoints targets for drug discovery. Imaging-based spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA sequencing provide, respectively, single-cell spatial information and transcriptome-wide measurements needed to study CCIs, but neither modality provides both. Existing spatial transcriptomics foundation models also cannot effectively learn from spatially resolved single-cell data with full-transcriptome coverage, explicitly infer the CCI mechanisms driving cell state-niche associations, or interpretable enough to support direct biological interpretations. Here, we present GITIII-scale, a hierarchical, interpretable pan-cancer spatial transcriptomics foundation model for TME representation learning that investigates cell state-niche associations and their underlying ligand-receptor (LR) signaling pathways. GITIII-scale uses transformers to model interactions between pairs of cells at defined spatial distances, an interpretable single-layer graph transformer without a feed-forward network to decompose how each gene in a receiver cell is influenced by each neighboring sender cell, and a graph transformer to generate cellular-neighborhood embeddings. Trained on our assembled pan-cancer database of specimen-matched scRNA-seq and imaging-based spatial transcriptomics datasets, GITIII-scale generated TME embeddings that recovered niche-associated state changes more accurately than existing spatial transcriptomics foundation models in cancer types unseen during training. A case study of an unseen breast cancer dataset further demonstrated the model's interpretability by identifying potentially drug-targetable LR pathways associated with endothelial overgrowth and tumorigenesis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xiao Xiao, Jiashu He, Shiyang Zhang, Meiyi Mao. 2026-08-26. Learning Interpretable Tumor Microenvironment Representations by Fitting Pan-Cancer Cell State-Niche Correlation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26208

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Transcriptomic Models for Immunotherapy Response Prediction Show Limited Cross-cohort Generalisability

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy; yet substantial proportion of patients exhibit intrinsic or acquired resistance, making accurate pre-treatment response prediction a critical unmet need. Transcriptomics-based biomarkers derived from bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) offer a promising avenue for capturing tumour-immune interactions, yet the cross-cohort generalisability of existing prediction models remains unclear.We systematically benchmark nine state-of-the-art transcriptomic ICI response predictors, five bulk RNA-seq-based models (COMPASS, IRNet, NetBio, IKCScore, and TNBC-ICI) and four scRNA-seq-based models (PRECISE, DeepGeneX, Tres and scCURE), using publicly available independent datasets unseen during model development. Overall, predictive performance was modest: bulk RNA-seq models performed at or near chance level across most cohorts, while scRNA-seq models showed only marginal improvements. Pathway-level analyses revealed sparse and inconsistent biomarker signals across models. Although scRNA-seq-based predictors converged on immune-related programs such as allograft rejection, bulk RNA-seq-based models exhibited little reproducible overlap. PRECISE and NetBio identified the most coherent immune-related themes, whereas IRNet predominantly captured metabolic pathways weakly aligned with ICI biology. Together, these findings demonstrate the limited cross-cohort robustness and biological consistency of current transcriptomic ICI prediction models, underscoring the need for improved domain adaptation, standardised preprocessing, and biologically grounded model design.

q-bio.GN

Large Language Model Agents for Evidence Based Genetic Disease Severity Classification

Disease severity classification for genetic conditions is subjective and labor-intensive, creating bottlenecks in genomic screening, where commercial panels vary widely in size and overlap. We developed an autonomous AI agent integrating Reasoning and Acting (ReAct) with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to classify 10,211 Human Phenotype Ontology terms. It uses American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG)-endorsed severity guidelines and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) quality-of-life criteria to retrieve PubMed literature, generate interpretable reasoning chains, and independently verify claims. At the phenotype level, using expert-curated cohorts, the agent achieved 93.55% accuracy (MCC 0.9237) with 82.6% to 91.4% of claims supported by direct evidence or valid inferences. Gene-level severity was aggregated across 8,738 pairs, identifying 3,283 autosomal recessive pairs with severe or profound presentations. External validation showed 95.2% concordance with Mackenzie's Mission gene list. This system enables standardized panel design by providing reliable, automated classification supported by direct evidence.

q-bio.GN

Harmonised benchmarking of foundation models for single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveals context-dependent generalisation

Single-cell and spatial foundation models promise transferable biological representations, yet their generality remains largely untested across modalities, biological domains and analytical tasks. We benchmarked six representative models, Nicheformer, CellPLM, scGPT-spatial, GenePT, scELMo and Novae, using a harmonised framework spanning scRNA-seq, spatial transcriptomics and Perturb-seq. We evaluated zero-shot and continually pretrained clustering, supervised annotation, marker-gene concordance and perturbation prediction. Model performance was strongly conditional: expression-trained cell-level transformers best resolved many cell-identity tasks, spatial and graph-aware models better preserved tissue architecture, and language-derived gene embeddings were competitive for selected perturbation-response metrics. No model dominated across tasks, and rankings shifted with modality, preprocessing, tokenisation, biological prior, domain shift and metric choice. This benchmark provides practical guidance for model selection and argues that future models should be judged by biological generalisation, interpretability and perturbation-grounded validity, not by scale or leaderboard performance alone.

q-bio.GN