Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.27707

Solution Methods for Infinite-Dimensional Generalized Disjunctive Programming

Abstract

Generalized disjunctive programming (GDP) expresses mixed discrete-continuous decisions through Boolean indicators and disjunctions, and can be systematically solved via a library of methods proposed in the literature. The recent InfiniteGDP abstraction lifts this modeling layer to continuous domains such as time, space, and uncertainty, but only the big-M and hull reformulations, the two endpoints of the relaxation spectrum, have been generalized to the infinite setting. This work closes this gap by generalizing four other GDP solution methods to infinite-dimensional optimization: the multiple big-M reformulation, P-split reformulation, cutting plane reformulation, and the logic-based outer approximation algorithm. It further proposes MBM-GP, a novel Gaussian-process variant of multiple big-M that learns the big-M function over the infinite domain from a small subset of the subproblem solves. Moreover, these approaches are implemented in the Julia package InfiniteDisjunctiveProgramming.jl. The methods are benchmarked on case studies arising in dynamic and stochastic optimization. The results demonstrate how the generalized solution methods can outperform big-M and hull, with MBM-GP retaining the tightness of multiple big-M at a fraction of its reformulation cost.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Daniel Nguyen, Joshua L. Pulsipher. 2026-08-27. Solution Methods for Infinite-Dimensional Generalized Disjunctive Programming. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27707

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A simple derivation of the Kalman filter

In this lecture note, we present a concise and self-contained derivation of the discrete-time Kalman filter equations that requires only a basic understanding of least squares estimation. The treatment is designed to minimize mathematical overhead while preserving both rigor and generality.

math.OC

Comment on "Event-Triggered Stabilization of Linear Time-Delay Systems via Halanay-Type Inequality"

This comment revisits Lemma 1 in [1], which plays a central role in the event-triggered stabilization analysis developed therein. We identify technical gaps in the proof of the lemma and provide a corrected argument. In particular, careful treatment of the exponentially decaying term shows that its decay rate must be retained in the resulting convergence estimate. The statement of the original lemma, with the exponential decay rate determined by the minimum of the characteristic decay rate and the decay rate of this term, remains valid.

math.OC