Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.28093

Managing Inherent Risk: On the Conceptualization of Risk in Defense Systems

Abstract

Certain defense systems are, by nature, deployed in a civilian environment in order to serve a defensive function for that environment. However, the risk involved with their deployment and operation poses a challenge for the public acceptance of these systems. Compared to safety engineering for civilian systems, the risk constellation is quite different. While reducing risk of safety-critical systems is generally desirable, defense systems are required to cause harm in order to be useful. In both cases, not all risk can be eliminated. The complex risk constellation of defense systems has implications for the systems' designs. We compare the concepts of risk in existing standards from both the civilian and the military domains. An extended constellation of risks needs to be considered, including risk caused by external threats to physical security. By including this risk constellation in public communication about defense systems, we aim to stimulate a productive debate.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

NIklas Braun, Leon J. Brettin, Marvin Loba, Markus Maurer. 2026-08-28. Managing Inherent Risk: On the Conceptualization of Risk in Defense Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28093

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A simple derivation of the Kalman filter

In this lecture note, we present a concise and self-contained derivation of the discrete-time Kalman filter equations that requires only a basic understanding of least squares estimation. The treatment is designed to minimize mathematical overhead while preserving both rigor and generality.

math.OC

Relative-Degree Wall Restricts Passivity-Based Stability Analysis in Inverter-Dominant Grids

This letter reveals a fundamental limitation of passivity-based distributed stability analysis in power systems. Under the standard formulation, passivity certification inherently imposes a relative-degree compatibility constraint that excludes many high-fidelity inverter dynamic models (e.g., those that include electromagnetic transients). Potential extensions of passivity frameworks are discussed to break this limitation.

eess.SY