Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.28819

Visible but Not Yet Curatable: Characterizing the Curatability of Compact and Derived Open LLM Artifacts

Yiyi Lu·Yilai Qian·Yucheng Jin
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Open Large Language Model (LLM) research increasingly produces compact and derived artifacts, such as adapters, quantized checkpoints, merged models, and distilled variants, that are distributed across papers, model hubs, model cards, code repositories, and release statements. Although these artifacts are publicly visible, digital libraries often lack sufficient evidence to identify, preserve, and cite them as coherent scholarly objects. We introduce a framework that conceptualizes curatability as a record-level property of distributed scholarly records and operationalizes it through four evidence dimensions: artifact identity, scholarly linkage, upstream evidence, and release assets. Guided by this framework, we conduct the first collection-scale characterization of open LLM curatability using a May 2026 snapshot of 191,375 public Hugging Face repositories and a core corpus of 2,214 scholarly papers. Our results reveal a pronounced visibility-to-curatability funnel. While 90.7% of paper records contain at least one useful curation signal, only 18.1% combine usable upstream evidence with concrete release evidence, and only 6.1% provide sufficiently coordinated evidence to support high-curatability records. Based on these findings, we derive a minimal seven-field curatable record and complementary responsibilities for model hubs, scholarly indexes, and digital libraries, providing practical guidance for improving the preservation and bibliographic control of open LLM artifacts.

Explore related subjects

cs.HCcs.DL

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yiyi Lu, Yilai Qian, Yucheng Jin. 2026-08-28. Visible but Not Yet Curatable: Characterizing the Curatability of Compact and Derived Open LLM Artifacts. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28819

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.DL subjectcs.HC subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

arXiv2026

Toward Postural State Classification in Immersive VR with Multimodal Data and Explainability Analysis

Ensuring a safe virtual reality (VR) experience requires systems that can predict and respond when users lose their balance. Although prior work has examined fall prediction and motion sickness, many approaches are regression-based and postural state classification remains less explored. This study compares machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for classifying postural states in VR under visual perturbations. We used a multimodal dataset containing kinematic, electromyographic (EMG), and electrodermal activity (EDA) signals. The data were prepared for a binary task to distinguish balanced from imbalanced postural states, and participant-wise downsampling addressed class imbalance. All models were evaluated with Leave-One-Participant-Out (LOPO) cross-validation to test generalization to unseen participants. Among the models, the Mamba-inspired CNN (MI-CNN) achieved the highest accuracy of 96.76%. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis improved interpretability and identified the most influential classification factors. The SHAP results showed that kinematic features were dominant, indicating that body-motion patterns are informative for detecting imbalance in VR. We also evaluated MI-CNN using only the top two-thirds of features ranked by SHAP importance. Despite a 33% reduction in input dimensionality, the model maintained performance, achieving 0.957 accuracy and 0.957 F1-score, with about a 1% decrease compared with the full-feature model. These findings suggest that multimodal sensing, temporal deep learning, and explainable AI can support reliable classification of balance-related instability in VR. Accurate recognition of imbalanced postural states may raise awareness of fall risk and guide safer, adaptive VR systems that respond to instability while improving user safety and experience. Code is available at: https://github.com/NipaAnjum/MI-CNN.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Are Widely Known Findings Easier to Retract?

Failures of retraction are common in science. Why do they occur? And what determines whether a retraction is successful? We use data from citation records and Altmetrics to test proposed answers to these questions. LaCroix et al. employ network models to argue the social spread of information helps explain failures of retraction. One prediction is that widely known results, surprisingly, should be easier to retract, since their retraction is more relevant. Our results support this conclusion. We find highly cited papers show more significant reductions in citation after retraction and garner more attention to their retractions as they occur.

cs.DL↗
arXiv2026

Filling holes in science draws collective attention, but most higher-order holes remain unexplored

Much scientific discovery involves filling holes between ideas and arguments that unleash techno-scientific advance. Representing knowledge as high-dimensional concept embeddings, we use persistent homology to detect holes of increasing order, from gaps between disconnected ideas to higher-order cavities, and identify the research works that fill them. We find two empirical asymmetries. Researchers who fill anticipated holes are poised to draw collective attention by staging outsized novelty and foresight, indicating that bridging holes anticipates where science will converge, most strongly in empirical fields and least in formal and design fields. Yet as knowledge grows, higher-order holes explode while the fraction science fills collapses, leaving most higher-order combinations unexplored. These results call for a richer science of holes, and mark a frontier where contemporary AI might help fill the high-dimensional gaps human science opens.

cs.CY↗