PruneShift: A Framework for Evaluating Decision Reliability in Structured Pruning

Hao Ye; Gaopeng Zhang

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.29765

PruneShift: A Framework for Evaluating Decision Reliability in Structured Pruning

Hao Ye·Gaopeng Zhang

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Structured pruning uses surrogate objectives because direct task evaluation over every feasible mask is too expensive. Most evaluations report average surrogate error or rank correlation on broadly sampled masks. These summaries do not directly test the mask chosen by the surrogate. We introduce PruneShift, an evaluation framework that separates broad predictive fidelity, fidelity near selector outputs, and the quality of the selected pruning decision. We first prove that Spearman and Kendall agreement can approach one while normalized selection regret remains maximal. We then derive sufficient conditions based on uniform error, selector suboptimality, decision margin, density ratio, and comparison mass. The analysis also yields a finite pool certificate with an explicit excess cost bound. Four studies test different links in this argument. External TextbookQA confirmation is heterogeneous: 7 of 20 simultaneous intervals favor the surrogate-selected mask, 6 favor its fixed comparator, and 7 cross zero. On a fixed Natural Questions pool, strict improvement holds in one of four settings. A controlled QQP experiment supports the proposed coverage mechanism in all 16 prespecified endpoints, although the sufficient bounds are conservative. Finally, a restricted OSSCAR reconstruction study on OPT-125M shows better local than broad fidelity in 68 of 75 primary endpoints. Independent fixed-mask confirmation is inconclusive in 24 of 25 endpoints and favors the comparator in one. These results show why predictive fit, decision reliability, and pruning method quality require separate evidence.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG cs.NE

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Hao Ye, Gaopeng Zhang. 2026-08-30. PruneShift: A Framework for Evaluating Decision Reliability in Structured Pruning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29765

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.LG subject cs.NE subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

arXiv2026

Understanding Deep Learning via Notions of Rank

Despite the extreme popularity of deep learning in science and industry, its formal understanding is limited. This thesis puts forth notions of rank as key for developing a theory of deep learning, focusing on the fundamental aspects of generalization and expressiveness. In particular, we establish that gradient-based training can induce an implicit regularization towards low rank for several neural network architectures, and demonstrate empirically that this phenomenon may facilitate an explanation of generalization over natural data (e.g., audio, images, and text). Then, we characterize the ability of graph neural networks to model interactions via a notion of rank, which is commonly used for quantifying entanglement in quantum physics. A central tool underlying these results is a connection between neural networks and tensor factorizations. Practical implications of our theory for designing explicit regularization schemes and data preprocessing algorithms are presented.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Evolutionary Soups: Evolving Mixture-of-Experts for Multi-Objective LLM Alignment

Large language models are increasingly required to generate responses that satisfy multiple competing objectives. Since optimal trade-offs depend on both user preferences and input prompts, controllable multi-objective generation must dynamically adapt models at inference time without retraining. To address this, we propose Evolutionary Soups, a mixture-of-experts framework for fine-grained generation control, with gating networks trained via an evolutionary algorithm. The per-layer gating networks dynamically produce expert-merging coefficients from hidden-state representations, while the evolutionary algorithm incorporates greedy hypervolume contribution for effective evolution of these gating networks, achieving consistent improvements on large and noisy training datasets and broader coverage of the non-convex Pareto front. Experiments across three tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of Evolutionary Soups over baselines: it achieves the best hypervolume, linear utility, and Tchebyshev utility (~20% improvement) among controllable methods on all tasks.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Multiclass Linear Perceptrons with Multiplicative Margins

This paper introduces a family of multiclass linear Perceptron classifiers with a multiplicative margin mechanism (MMPerc), as an alternative to standard margin-free and additive margin Perceptrons. The multiplicative formulation enforces classification confidence by requiring the true class score to exceed that of competing classes by a specified fraction of itself, rather than by a fixed additive threshold. This avoids dependence on score magnitudes arising from varied norms of data and class weight vectors. We propose several architectural and algorithmic variants of MMPerc, derive associated loss functions and mistake bounds for both linearly separable and non-separable data, and analyze key design considerations, including bias, margin threshold selection, and training modes. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real datasets show that MMPerc classifiers typically outperform the standard Perceptron, as well as classic baselines such as Support Vector Machines and Ridge classifiers. Owing to their simplicity, minimalistic design, and computational efficiency, MMPerc classifiers are promising candidates for conventional machine learning tasks, linear evaluation of Deep Neural Networks, integration with Hyperdimensional Computing / Vector Symbolic Architecture representations, and deployment in resource-constrained applications.

cs.LG↗