Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.29834

You Know What I Mean: A Benchmark for Agentic Conversational Reference Grounding

Karen Fuchs·Uri Katz·Yoav Goldberg
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Collaborative conversations frequently contain references whose targets are indirect rather than named: resolving "this looks like the fix discussed yesterday" requires combining conversational context with evidence from the surrounding workspace which is accessible through APIs or user interfaces. We formalize this problem as Conversational Reference Grounding (CoRG): using a given set of tools to resolve a reference in conversation to the unique external item intended by the speaker. CoRG is challenging because it combines lexical, semantic, and temporal cues distributed across the conversation and the external workspace. Agents must translate these heterogeneous signals into effective tool use: formulating strategies, discovering plausible candidates, inspecting their metadata and content, and ruling out close alternatives. We study CoRG through RepoRef, a benchmark of 400 developer-chat segments grounded in GitHub issues, pull requests, and commits across 92 repositories. Unlike single-shot retrieval tasks, RepoRef often requires multi-step tool use. Our results show that CoRG remains challenging for current agents, even the best agent reaches only 67.0% success rate, leaving one third of references unresolved. These findings position CoRG as a concrete benchmark for studying how agents search, inspect, and verify information in realistic multi-tool environments.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.IR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Karen Fuchs, Uri Katz, Yoav Goldberg. 2026-08-30. You Know What I Mean: A Benchmark for Agentic Conversational Reference Grounding. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29834

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.CL subjectcs.IR subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SABER-Math: Automated Benchmark for Information Retrieval Evaluation in Mathematics

As agentic AI systems tackle more complex mathematical tasks, they increasingly rely on information retrieval (IR) to search problem databases, theorem libraries, and educational resources. However, choosing the right retriever remains difficult, as it is infeasible to directly isolate its effect on downstream performance. On the other hand, existing retrieval-specific benchmarks often fail to capture fine-grained mathematical relevance, penalizing relevant documents. We address this gap by introducing SABER-Math, the first fully automated benchmark for evaluating mathematical IR without expert annotation. Starting from 283K high-school-level math problems with solutions, SABER-Math builds challenging reranking tasks in three steps: (i) first, LLMs extract concise solution summaries and mathematical topics for each problem; (ii) then, per-query relevant documents are discovered using ontology topic-based and lexical solutions-summary-based similarities, and (iii) finally, a Swiss-style LLM preference tournament produces fine-grained relevance ratings for the documents. We evaluate lexical retrievers, specialized mathematical retrieval systems, and recent embedding models. We find that while modern embedding models substantially outperform classical and math-specific baselines, even the strongest systems struggle in symbol-heavy domains like Algebra and Calculus. Importantly, we show that general-purpose IR benchmarks such as MTEB do not reliably predict mathematical performance, especially for recent embedding models, highlighting the need for math-specific retrieval benchmarks.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

CAGE: Coherence-Aware Graph Encoding for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Traditional Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems score each passage independently against the query, assembling context sets that may be individually relevant yet collectively incoherent. We introduce Coherence-Aware Graph Encoding (CAGE), a reranking framework that models "between-chunk coherence" across four dimensions: Intra-Domain Relevance, Noise Resistance, Informational Bonding, and Factual Consistency. Our pipeline transforms retrieved passages into directed heterogeneous entity graphs, amplifies factual anchors via min-out-degree reweighting, encodes structural patterns through a Relational Graph Convolutional Network, and fuses inter-chunk coherence with query relevance for final ranking. Evaluated across four multi-hop benchmarks, CAGE matches or outperforms strong baselines including monoT5 in Recall@5 on bridge-dominated datasets and consistently improves downstream Exact Match, demonstrating that structurally coherent context yields more precise answers even when retrieval recall is comparable or lower.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Beyond Polarization: The Generative Constraint of Chain-of-Thought in Pointwise Reranking

In pointwise document reranking, Chain-of-Thought models typically underperform direct scoring models. While existing diagnostics attribute this to inferior classification, score polarization, or calibration breakdown, whether targeted training can bridge this gap remains unclear. Our empirical study first confirms that this gap is stable across scales up to 32B parameters, ruling out model and data capacity confounders. We then apply stress tests utilizing reinforcement learning, fine-grained supervision, and architectural decoupling to explicitly repair these deviations. Although these interventions improve classification accuracy and absolute scores, the relative ranking gap persists. These findings suggest that, within the pointwise scoring paradigm, routing continuous relevance semantics through discrete text constrains ranking signal resolution, revealing a bottleneck that is stable and difficult to overcome under current standard methods, rather than an easily resolvable training bias.

cs.CL↗