Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2608.29908

Finite Sample Identification of Analytic Nonlinear Systems

Abstract

This paper studies the identification of linearly parameterized nonlinear (LPN) systems. Although LPN systems share the same linear parameterization structure as linear systems, they are more challenging to identify. In particular, previous work has shown, through a counterexample based on a piecewise-affine system, that non-active exploration is generally insufficient for LPN system identification. In this paper, we consider LPN systems with real-analytic feature functions. We show that non-active exploration is sufficient for the identification of this class of systems by establishing non-asymptotic convergence rates of least-squares estimation and set-membership estimation. In addition, we provide counterexamples to show that non-active exploration may not be sufficient for system identification for non-real-analytic systems, even if those systems are infinitely differentiable. We present numerical experiments to further support and validate our theoretical results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Negin Musavi, Ziyao Guo, Geir E. Dullerud, Yingying Li. 2026-08-30. Finite Sample Identification of Analytic Nonlinear Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29908

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A simple derivation of the Kalman filter

In this lecture note, we present a concise and self-contained derivation of the discrete-time Kalman filter equations that requires only a basic understanding of least squares estimation. The treatment is designed to minimize mathematical overhead while preserving both rigor and generality.

math.OC

Comment on "Event-Triggered Stabilization of Linear Time-Delay Systems via Halanay-Type Inequality"

This comment revisits Lemma 1 in [1], which plays a central role in the event-triggered stabilization analysis developed therein. We identify technical gaps in the proof of the lemma and provide a corrected argument. In particular, careful treatment of the exponentially decaying term shows that its decay rate must be retained in the resulting convergence estimate. The statement of the original lemma, with the exponential decay rate determined by the minimum of the characteristic decay rate and the decay rate of this term, remains valid.

math.OC