Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.00286

Non-Blocking Fault Current Limiting Control of Half-Bridge MMCs for MTDC Transmission

Abstract

A key protection requirement in multiterminal HVDC (MTDC) transmission systems is to selectively isolate faulted areas using DC circuit breakers (DCCBs) during DC faults while keeping the rest of the systems in operation. However, in MTDC systems using half-bridge modular multilevel converters (HB-MMCs), the lack of inherent fault current suppression capability in HB-MMCs can cause converter blocking before fault clearance by DCCBs. This work presents an active fault current limiting (AFCL) control strategy for HB-MMCs to mitigate DC fault currents, thus avoiding converter blocking and reducing the breaking capability required of DCCBs. In addition, a systematic approach is proposed to design the AFCL control strategy under converter and network stability constraints. The effectiveness of the proposed strategy is demonstrated through PSCAD on two typical MTDC systems during DC faults.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Pengxiang Huang, Shahil Shah. 2026-08-31. Non-Blocking Fault Current Limiting Control of Half-Bridge MMCs for MTDC Transmission. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00286

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A simple derivation of the Kalman filter

In this lecture note, we present a concise and self-contained derivation of the discrete-time Kalman filter equations that requires only a basic understanding of least squares estimation. The treatment is designed to minimize mathematical overhead while preserving both rigor and generality.

math.OC

Relative-Degree Wall Restricts Passivity-Based Stability Analysis in Inverter-Dominant Grids

This letter reveals a fundamental limitation of passivity-based distributed stability analysis in power systems. Under the standard formulation, passivity certification inherently imposes a relative-degree compatibility constraint that excludes many high-fidelity inverter dynamic models (e.g., those that include electromagnetic transients). Potential extensions of passivity frameworks are discussed to break this limitation.

eess.SY