Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.01036

MultiGait: A Multi-Sensor Multi-Perspective Multi-Session Biometric Inference Benchmark and its Dataset

Julian Todt·Felix Morsbach·Philip Dissert·Thorsten Strufe
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A lack of suitable datasets has limited the research into the privacy risks of novel smart city sensors, such as thermal cameras, depth cameras, and lidar. Given the number of unsubstantiated privacy claims and their potential widespread deployment into many people's everyday life, understanding the privacy risks of these sensors -- in isolation and in like-for-like comparisons -- is crucial. With MultiGait, we collected the first multi-sensor, multi-perspective, multi-session gait-focused dataset, for the corresponding, and additional more far-reaching investigations. The dataset, validated with multiple state-of-the-art recognition systems, comprises various walking modes and annotated personal attributes for 199 individuals, to ensure the benefit for advanced studies including cross-sensor recognition and anonymization at the edge. MultiGait represents a foundation for rigorous privacy investigations, demonstrated through an extensive identity inference benchmark across eight sensors, four perspectives, and three recording sessions. Our benchmark incidentally reveals that sensors often assumed to be privacy-friendly do still entail considerable identity inference risks, while the poor cross-session generalization of existing methods underscores an important research gap.

Explore related subjects

cs.CRcs.CV

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Julian Todt, Felix Morsbach, Philip Dissert, Thorsten Strufe. 2026-09-01. MultiGait: A Multi-Sensor Multi-Perspective Multi-Session Biometric Inference Benchmark and its Dataset. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01036

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.CR subjectcs.CV subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Vision Token Manipulation Attacks on Cloud-Edge Inference of Large Vision-Language Models

Cloud-edge Large Vision-Language Model (LVLM) inference enables efficient deployment by splitting computation between edge devices and cloud servers. In this process, intermediate vision tokens are transmitted from the edge to the cloud over a communication link, thereby exposing a new attack surface. We study vision token manipulation attack (VTM-Attack) under a black-box man-in-the-middle setting, where an adversary intercepts and manipulates a subset of transmitted vision tokens under a budget constraint. We propose four naïve attack strategies and an optimization-based token selection method. Experiments on 6 state-of-the-art LVLMs (3B-72B) across 4 benchmarks show that manipulating only 10\% of vision tokens can reduce accuracy by up to 88.31\%. These results reveal a critical vulnerability in cloud-edge LVLM inference.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

A Survey on Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Diffusion Models Across Multiple Modalities

Diffusion models have become the dominant family of generative models in the visual domain. However, their widespread public availability enables misuse at scale, motivating a rapidly growing body of research on adversarial attacks and defenses. This survey provides, to our knowledge, the first unified review of this literature across three visual modalities: image, video, and 3D. We introduce a comprehensive, task-centric taxonomy: we first divide the literature by modality; within each modality, we separate methods into attacks and defenses, and then group them by the generative task they target, presenting them chronologically within each task. Moreover, we provide an in-depth analysis of their evaluation settings, consolidating the datasets, metrics, and benchmarks used to assess them. We conclude by identifying several open challenges and outlining concrete future research directions. Project Webpage: https://github.com/ozgurkara99/awesome-adv-attack-defense-on-diffusion

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

SpatialTrust: A Benchmark for Environmental Risk Recognition in Secure Authentication

Visual environmental risk recognition plays an important role in secure authentication, where a user's surroundings may reveal sensitive information or introduce potential security risks. However, existing evaluations of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) rarely examine whether models can reliably recognize, localize, and explain such risks in spatially grounded authentication scenarios. We present SpatialTrust, a question-answering benchmark for evaluating environmental risk recognition in secure authentication. SpatialTrust assesses five complementary abilities: sensitive factor detection, direct factor identification, indirect factor identification, direct factor explanation, and indirect factor explanation. We evaluate both proprietary and open-source MLLMs and find that current models show limited performance, especially in understanding and explaining indirect risks, indicating that spatial risk awareness remains a challenging capability for MLLMs. In addition, we introduce SpatialTrustGuard, a structured QA-and-audit pipeline that improves Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct from 36.78% to 41.12% overall. Our findings highlight the need for dedicated benchmarks and structured inference methods to improve the trustworthiness of MLLMs in secure authentication.

cs.CR↗