arXiv · 2609.01642
Imagine Before Retrieval: Prospective Skill Retrieval for LLM Agents
Abstract
Skill retrieval has recently emerged as a promising paradigm for identifying the desirable execution guidelines from the skill gallery, thus equipping large language model (LLM) agents with the procedural knowledge to accomplish the specified task. To this end, most existing methods customize the retrieval model or reconfigure the retrieval pipeline to prioritize skills that are most semantically relevant to the task query. However, we empirically reveal that task queries and skills are naturally formulated from different perspectives, namely, objective-oriented and procedural-oriented, leading to an under-explored problem termed Query--Skill Misalignment (QSM). Clearly, it is daunting and even impossible to associate the desirable skills in the context of QSM, thus hindering the agent from correctly executing the task. As a remedy, inspired by human prospective cognition, we propose SkillDreamer, a novel framework to alleviate the negative impact of QSM problem. In brief, SkillDreamer first infers the capabilities necessary for task execution, then imagines how to realize these capabilities by generating pseudo skills, and finally leverages such prospective information to bridge the gap between objective-oriented task queries and execution-oriented skills. Extensive experiments on SkillRet and SkillUsage not only verify the effectiveness of SkillDreamer in both skill retrieval and end-to-end task execution, but also demonstrate its generalizability across diverse retrieval models and pipelines. The code will be released upon acceptance.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Shuo Liu, Yutong Yang, Haohao Xiao, Mouxing Yang, Xi Peng. 2026-08-28. Imagine Before Retrieval: Prospective Skill Retrieval for LLM Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01642
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
Discover connections
Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.